Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CHAPTER 3 - NUMERIC CRITERIA FOR SALINITY <br /> <br />o <br />N <br />~ <br />I-' <br /> <br />Overview <br /> <br />As discussed earlier in this report, the EP A promulgated a regulation which set forth a <br />basinwide salinity control policy for the Colorado River Basin. This policy required that the flow- <br />weighted average annual salinity in the lower mainstem of the Colorado River be maintained at or <br />below the 1972 levels. The Basin states, acting through the Forum, addressed this requirement in <br />its first Review entitled Water Quality Standards for Salinity Including Numeric Criteria and Plan <br />of Implementation for Salinity Control- Colorado River System dated June 1975. <br /> <br />In the 1975 Review, the Forum proposed three stations as appropriate points in the lower <br />mainstem of the Colorado River at which to measure the flow-weighted average annual salinity. <br />These stations are located at the following points: (1) below Hoover Dam; (2) below Parker Dam; <br />and (3) at Imperial Dam. The basis for selecting these stations is their proximity to key diversion <br />facilities on the lower Colorado River. Nevada diverts Colorado River mainstem water from Lake <br />Mead for use in the Las Vegas area. The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and the <br />Central Arizona Project divert water from Lake Havasu, impounded behind Parker Darn, for millions <br />of water users in southern California and central Arizona, respectively. The large agricultural areas <br />in the Imperial and Coachella Valleys in California and the Yuma area in Arizona are served by <br />diversions at Imperial Dam. <br /> <br />The flow-weighted average annual salinity for these stations was determined by Reclamation <br />from daily flow and salinity data collected in 1972 by USGS and Reclamation and became the <br />numeric criteria. The fact that 1972 was chosen as the basis for establishing the numeric criteria <br />creates no inference that 1972 represented a typical or average year from either a hydrologic or water <br />quality perspective. The numeric criteria for each of those stations is as follows: <br /> <br />Below Hoover Dam <br />Below Parker Dam <br />At Imperial Dam <br /> <br />723 mg/L <br />747 mg/L <br />879 mg/L <br /> <br />The criteria were established to protect infrastructure and crop production rather than human <br />health or fish and wildlife values. The salinity concentrations that are anticipated in the future, even <br />without salinity control efforts, have not been shown to have adverse effects on human health or <br />wildlife. Thus, the Colorado River Salinity Control Program is different from most other water <br />quality standards compliance programs. <br /> <br />3-1 <br />