Laserfiche WebLink
<br />C? <br />c:) <br />_:-J <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />{.0 <br />I:J1 <br /> <br />forms (e.g., rainbow trout) when native prey are absent or <br />greatly diminished in abundance. <br /> <br />In the San Juan River sub-basin, 23 non-native fish species have <br />been reported. In comparison to other Upper Colorado River Basin <br />drainages, the San Juan has few common or widely distributed non- <br />native fish species. Of these, only common carp and channel <br />catfish are common in main channel habitats within warIDwater <br />reaches and red shiner and fathead minnow are the most common <br />non-natives in associated low-velocity habitats. Other non- <br />native species in warmwater reaches are uncommon or occur <br />sporadically. In main channel habitats, native fish species <br />remain numerically dominant, but non-natives numerically dominate <br />many low-velocity habitats. <br /> <br />Although the impact of non-native fishes upon the native fish <br />fauna has been known for some time, means to eliminate or reduce <br />problem species are limited, expensive, and usually not feasible. <br />An essential element of any control effort is accurate definition <br />of the problem. Among non-native fishes inhabiting the San Juan, <br />the mode of interaction of particular non-native species with <br />specific native species (or life stages of each) is not clearly <br />defined. For example, adults of channel catfish consume a <br />variety of food items, including fish. However, the relative <br />impact of their foraging habits upon particular life stages of <br />Colorado squawfish or other natives is not known. In low- <br />velocity habitats, young of Colorado squawfish may compete for <br />food and habitat with several non-natives. The effect of this <br />presumed competition upon recruitment of young of Colorado <br />squawfishto larger size-classes is unknown. <br /> <br />Although the San Juan River drainage is occupied by several <br />warmwater non-native fish species, additional stocking of these <br />species or introduction of new species will only exacerbate <br />problems. In this sense, the best control is prevention of <br />potential problems by eliminating stocking of non-native <br />warmwater species. <br /> <br />The high flows of 1987 demonstrated an effective method of <br />control of non-native species. That year, successful <br />reproduction by channel catfish was markedly lower than in <br />subsequent years when spring run-off was much lower and of <br />shorter duration. <br /> <br />Other controls, such as chemical treatment, are biologically and <br />logistically infeasible in almost all situations on the San Juan <br />River. Some actions, while not strictly control, may be <br />warranted in particular instances. Such actions might include <br />habitat modifications to the detriment of non-native fishes, and <br />presumably the benefit of native species. <br /> <br />stocking of most non-native fish species in the San Juan Drainage <br />