Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1,1 <br /> <br />ii <br />'II <br />,I, <br />Iii: <br />:;;1 <br /> <br />demands in any month. Peak discharges under <br />existingnonnal operations would not exceed 31,500 ds. <br />Use of the full powerplant capacity (33,200 ds) would <br />be studied as a subalternative. Historically, minimum <br />flows allowable have been 1,000 ds from Labor Day <br />until Easter and 3,000 ds from Easter until Labor Day <br />(the recreation season). <br /> <br />Elements Potentially Added to Any <br />Alternative <br /> <br />:i! <br />I!:' <br />ill <br />,Ii <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />The following elements may potentially be applied to <br />any alternative to meet a need or to mitigate adverse <br />consequences of the alternative under analysis. It may <br />be operational or nonoperational, structural or <br />nonstructural. Elements will be added to alternatives <br />where logically appropriate to further meet the <br />objective of the alternative or if identified as a need <br />through the long-term monitoring program. <br />Mitigation measures also may be added as necessary. <br /> <br />Sand Pumping - Sand deposited in the Colorado River <br />channel could be pumped onto selected beaches, sand- <br />bars, or terrace deposits where a source of river channel <br />sand is readily available. <br /> <br />Beach Protection - Rock jetties or riprap lining could be <br />constructed to protect beaches at selected locations. All <br />structures would consist of native rock and vegetation <br />to blend with the natural environment. Because of <br />logistical constraints, only beaches within a few <br />hundred yards of a debris fan could be protected in this <br />manner. <br /> <br />:1 <br />, <br />, <br /> <br />i <br />" <br />1.1 <br />I,i <br />,'I <br />1 <br />Iii <br />'I'i <br />) <br />I; <br />Ii; <br />! <br /> <br />i' <br />,I <br />':1 <br />I <br />I.' <br />i.: <br /> <br />,I <br /> <br />I,! <br /> <br />I <br />" <br />, <br /> <br />BeachjHabitat Building Flows - Special high releases <br />of from 6 to 14 days duration could be made to help <br />rebuild eroded beaches, increase terrestrial habitat, and <br />create and maintain rearing habitat for native fishes in <br />the Grand Canyon. High flow releases could be <br />scheduled to coincide when there are high <br />concentrations of sediment in the Colorado River <br />tributaries. Sand stored within channel pools and <br />eddies would provide the primary source of material. <br />Beach or habitat building flows would exceed the <br />normal operating range to deposit sand on the elevated <br />beaches. High flows build some beaches, while <br />eroding others; and the optimum discharge may have <br />to be determined experimentally. Since these special <br />releases would be scheduled after the channel pools <br />and eddies refill with sand, the special releases may be <br />scheduled only once in several years. Beach/habitat <br />building flows would be considered research flows; <br />and the effect on downstream resources would require <br />careful monitoring before, during, and after the event. <br /> <br />Reduced Flood Frequency - The large flood releases <br />caused by the high spring runoffs between 1983 and <br /> <br />I' <br />, <br />I <br />j! <br />I <br />" <br />I! <br />ii' <br />II: <br />I', <br /> <br />Ii <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />1986 caused significant degradation of the environment <br />by eroding many of the sand deposits within Glen and <br />Grand Canyons. Peak flows were over 90,000 ds'in <br />1983, and peak discharges ranged between 45,000 and <br />53,000 ds from 1984 to 1986. To reduce the frequency <br />and magnitude of spills, more space could be reserved <br />in Lake Powell to accommodate high spring runoff or <br />the height of the spillway could be raised to increase its <br />capacity, although no designated flood storage <br />currently exists in Lake Powell. <br /> <br />Multilevel Intake Structure - Preliminary studies <br />indicate that selective withdrawal structures Oll the <br />existing penstocks could permit water to be withdrawn <br />from selected reservoir levels to adjust downstream <br />river temperatures. Withdrawals could be adjusted on <br />a seasonal basis to meet ecological objectives such as <br />improving habitat for native fishes. The consequences <br />of multilevel releases on all facets of the environment <br />need to be further evaluated. Additional research and <br />analysis will be conducted to answer unresolved issues <br />as appropriate .under the adaptive management <br />program. <br /> <br />Power System Adjustments - For each alternative, the <br />Western Area Power Administration (Western) may <br />change the manner in which it markets energy and <br />capacity from Glen Canyon Dam. The Glen Canyon <br />Environmental Studies' Power Resources Committee is ' <br />evaluating both a resource-based marketing plan and <br />fixed-levels for marketing energy and capacity from <br />Glen Canyon Dam. Western and its customers could <br />consider the following options for each alternative: <br /> <br />. Purchase power from alternate sources <br /> <br />. Build new power facilities <br /> <br />. Change transmission system capability <br /> <br />. Increase energy conservation <br /> <br />Adaptive Management - Adaptive Management is <br />considered to be an essential element of each <br />alternative--particularly the selected alternative. It <br />includes organized research and monitoring <br />coordinated by a multiagency resource managment <br />and review group that will evaluate the effectiveness of <br />the selected plan in meeting resource management <br />objectives. <br />