Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />r.. <br /> <br />:, <br /> <br />c.'? <br /> <br />C.~", <br /> <br />These species <br />equivalent to <br />crop within <br />inundation. <br /> <br />have the ability to erow and function at salinities <br />seawater, are able to over-winter or produce a full <br />seven months, and can tolerate extended periods of <br />Each also appears to have multiproduct potential. <br /> <br />C', <br />.~ <br /> <br />. " <br />_. <br /> <br />Site Selection <br /> <br />Criteria were established to euide the selection of sites for process <br />implementation. The desirable characteristics of a site for STEP <br />operations were identified as open, level terrain, exposed to wind <br />and sun, located within the protective shield of the Grand Valley. A <br />prime deter.inant is soil composition, principally sands and silt, <br />with minimal clay and organics; this would be classified as marginal, <br />undesirable agricultural land. <br /> <br />Data Limitations <br /> <br />The available data are deficient in the quantitative definition of <br />upper salinity tolerance limits within emergent halophytes, including <br />the i.pact of high salinity on halophyte growth and <br />evapotranspiration rates, as well as product opportunities. These <br />effects must be known in order to engineer and cost the STEP process <br />facilities; this also applies to the development of operational <br />procedures and .anagement strategies appropriate for the plants and <br />the process. <br /> <br />The criteria provided as guidelines to DEC during its development of <br />preliminary conceptual engineering designs of the STEP process were <br />the same as given in Table I, except that evapotranspiration data <br />then available indicated rates at .75 inches per day could reasonably <br />be expected, based on reports that .ay not have corrected for oasis <br />and large pond effects. Similarly, short-term salinity tolerance <br />levels were believed near 77,000 mg/l, based on inputs received from <br />professional consultations. While that level may remain achievable, <br />insufficient experience at this concentration is shown by the <br />available literature. IBR thus reduced its expectation to 40,000 <br />mg/l, a value that is readily supportable, but after DEC had <br />completed its preliminary design and costing efforts. As a result, <br />the preliminary designs prepared by DEC are based on different <br />perfor.ance criteria. It is shown in Chapter Pour that the impact <br />of this difference is not on the design concept, but rather on area <br />requirements for pond facilities. <br /> <br />PRELIMINARY CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING DESIGN <br /> <br />The STEP process flow sheet developed by DEC is shown as Figure 2. <br />This shows that 12,236 acre-feet of saline water is transported <br />annually via pipeline to spray evapo~ation cooling ponds. The <br />function of these ponds is to regulate the input water temperature so <br />as not to exceed the upper temperature threshold (taken as 860p) of <br />the STEP crops: it is recognized that these ponds may not be needed. <br />Cooled saline water is input to STEP crop production ponds where <br />water is consumed through evapotranspiration and feeds, chemicals, <br />and materials' are produced. The output from the prOduction ponds <br />passes into spray evaporation ponds for concentrating to saturated <br />E-5 <br />