Laserfiche WebLink
<br />d:> <br />O? <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />" ~, <br /> <br />brine. Additional water il evaporated. and 8 acre-feet of calciu. <br />sulfate (EYPSU.) is produced each year. The laturated brine il <br />transported to final evaporation ponds where 179 acre-feet of 73~ <br />solids is produced annually for use or disposal. <br /> <br />c::) <br />,-". <br />....' <br /> <br />DurinE the STEP process, the freezinE point of the Glenwood SprinE8 <br />o 0 <br />saline water is reduced fro. 30 F to 0 F per.ittinE operation of <br />at least part of the STEP process (spray evaporation ponds. etc.) <br />durinE the winter. Winter carryover storaEe is also provided within <br />the desiEn of the STEP ponds. <br /> <br />The STEP crop production ponds include an extensive underdrain syste. <br />to prevent water salinity in the root zone fro. beco.inE excessive. <br />In addition. all ponds are underlain with a 20 .il thick polyethylene <br />i.per.eable liner. A new lining technique (Pozzolan) with a 10 year <br />history of satisfactory perfor.ance with saline waters with salt <br />concentrations ranging fro. sea water to saturation is briefly <br />discussed. This lining technique offers the possibility of a <br />superior liner at lower cost. <br /> <br />PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES <br /> <br />All STEP process costs are reported in 1985 dollars. The cost <br />effectiveness of beneficial use (i2norin2 profits) and disposal of <br />all the Glenwood Sprin2s saline water (12,236 acre-feet per year) and <br />the salt it contains (310,321 tons per year) at the Mack site is $52 <br />per ton. This aay be coapared with costs of $107 and $110 per ton <br />for the G and DG West Salt Creek Alternatives (January. 1983. <br />dollars) . <br /> <br />At the <br />represents <br />process. <br />avera2e <br />ton and <br />cost. <br /> <br />Mack site, the Glenwood Springs transaission pipeline <br />67~ of the total construction costs of the STEP <br />Accordingly it was deterained that the base cost (for an <br />existin2 2round slope of 1~) of the STEP process is $17 per <br />that each aile of pipeline adds 30 cents per ton to this base' <br /> <br />Overall. <br />24~ that <br />available <br /> <br />the land requirements for the STEP process are only 20 to <br />of evaporation ponds. so a wider variety of sites are <br />to reduce the length of the transmission pipeline. <br /> <br />For the saae quantity of water evaporated per unit tiae. STEP crop <br />production ponds have construction costs about 67~ that of spray <br />evaporation ponds and about 34~ that of evaporation ponds. <br /> <br />PROCESS ECONOMICS <br /> <br />The preceeding biological. site and engineering considerations are <br />consolidated and analyzed to identify determinants of perfor.ance and <br />cost. These determinants are quantitatively related and assembled <br />within a co.puter .odel utilized to assess cost-effectiveness of the <br />process and its sensitivity to changes in perforaance. to <br />construction options. and to siting alternatives. This is done to <br />guide future development toward cost-effective design. construction. <br />E-7 <br />