Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'1 <br />I <br />~. <br />I <br /> <br />~7 <br /> <br />--~~'-~_.,-----~~-~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />All oj the technica I experts, both those of the Hoover Power <br />allottees and those of the Bureau of Reclamation, advise that to attempt <br />to operate the Hoover units below elevation 1,083 is too risky. <br /> <br />In the event these units would have to be shut down by water dropping <br />below this level, a power replacement program in the magnItude of 1,340,000 <br />kilowatts of power would be required. This kind of capacity is Simply not <br />available. If it were Civailable, costs would obviously be prohibitive" For <br />this reason alone, maintenance of elevation 1,083 at Lake Mead is a must <br />even though this would require drawdown of Lake Powell to be resumed in <br />Mid-July. <br /> <br />If it appears in July that while Lake Mead can be maintained at <br />elevation 1,083 but Lake Powell nevertheless cannot reach operating level, <br />the question of retaining in Lake Powell the water then in storage in that <br />reservoir or of releasing it to restore the level of Lake Mead will have to <br />be faced. The cost to the Upper Basin Fund might well be less if, under <br />those circumstances, Lake Mead were to be restored and the power-purchase <br />program terminated or reduced. <br /> <br />Another hazard involved here is that, even though Lake Powell may go into <br />operation at its minimum level, the runoff next spring could be so low as again <br />to require the lowering of Lake Powell beyond the minimum operating head in <br />order to keep Lake Mead at even a minimum level. ln this event, the Government <br />may well be obligated to buy power at the expense of the Upper Basin fund to <br />supply its, Upper Basin power sales contracts as well as the Hoover powerallottees. <br /> <br />While, in view of the present forecast, it may now appear likely that' <br />Lake Powell can reach minimum operating level this summer, resumption <br />of filling should be undertaken only with e'Jeryone' s eyes wide open. If the <br />expected runoff does not materialize, it would, of course, be folly to continue <br />storage at Glen Canyon Dam, and not produce power at either dam. <br /> <br />This Department and the states of the Colorado River Basin are entering <br />a new era of water management. The free and easy days of water use are over <br />and the era of water conservation must now begin. The Colorado is but a <br />single river, and from this point forward every acre foot of water saved anywhere <br />on the system is water saved for all. <br /> <br />Consequently, a major topic of discussion at my meeting with the <br />Upper Basin-Governors and water officials in Salt Lake City on Friday will <br />be water conservation. And at Las Vegas, on Saturdi'lY, I hope to be in a <br />position, with the cooperation of Lower Basin users, to announce and im- <br />plement a voluntary water conservation program which should produce water <br />saving that will amount to a half million acre feet in 1964. <br /> <br />-461- <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />