Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />The an arCM'ld IftCIl'l w.<<s a solid BaIHonelhort """ IhIrtwith pocI.t <br />in Ioshion colon. $5 <br /> <br />Matched with 100% ~ douw. knit ponti with _'-" podret and <br />liar 100,""'" r..a.., $17 <br /> <br />~nne"J <br /> <br />a........,,0I"- '--rs .......c......... Cily.""". NorIhel-t <br />.v........DowMo......Ft.ColInr..o-.t.y. CoIlI.SpringI <br />eu,w. ... Pfalll e w.......... I'tazo e I.aIlewaocf.JCI . Aunwo <br /> <br />36 <br /> <br /> <br />At 3,606 leet elevation, Lake Powell will touch monument boundary <br />(solid line), At 3,700 feet, the water will cross it (dotted line). <br /> <br />Two rivermen suggest that a 3,700-'oot <br />lake would strengthen the bridge <br /> <br />BRIDGE continued <br />1956 Act by submitting requests <br />to Congress for appropriations <br />to build either a tunnel to divert <br />water around the monument ($6- <br />million) or a barrier dam in the <br />canyon below ($25 million). <br />Congress, meanwhile, includ. <br />ed another specific provision in <br />the annual Glen Canyon Dam <br />appropriations bill: "No part of <br />the funds herein appropriated <br />shall be available for construc-' <br />tion or operation of facilities to <br />prevent waters 01 Lake Powell <br />from entering any national <br />monument." <br />That's exactly opposite to the <br />position Congress took in the au- <br />thorizing law of 1956! And the <br />no-money-for-keeping-out-the <br />water restriction has been <br />repeated every year. <br />Udall himself led a host of <br />congressmen, conservationists <br />and journalists into Rainbow <br />Bridge by helicopters in 1961 and <br />came away opposing any barrier <br />dam construction. He said such <br />engineering would destroy the <br />wilderness nature of the area, <br />reduce the value of the storage <br />project and restrict public use of <br />the lake, Besides, he added, "ge- <br />ologists agree no actual harm" <br />would be done to the monument <br />by Lake Powell. <br /> <br />.It~ <br /> <br />A lawsuit, almost identical to <br />the one now pending, was dis- <br />missed in 1963 by a 'District 01 <br />Columbia judge. His decision <br />was on motions attacking the le- <br />gality af the camplaint and no <br />trial was held on the merits of the <br />damage charges. Appeals by the <br />plaintiff conservationists were <br />relected by both the U.S, Court <br />of Appeals and the Supreme <br />Court. The new suit is in the mo- <br />tions stages. <br />The gorge beneath the bridge, <br />about 110 feet across. is cut into <br />harder Kayenta sandstone. <br />Black "varnish" is on the walls <br />and rock debris clutters the bed. <br />Its ugliness contrasts wi~ the <br />beauty above. It is easy to' imag- <br />ine blue-green water there, re- <br />flecting the arch above, enhanc- <br />ing its breathtaking beauty. <br />But would static water~en <br />fluctuating water-up to the base <br />of the bridge damage it? <br />Two af our companions on the <br />journey, with four decades of <br />experience on the ColaradO' <br />River, contend a 3,700-foot lake <br />can't possibly damage Rainbow <br />Bridge. They even suggest it <br />would strengthen the bridge. <br />Larry Sanderson, at just 41, is <br />the oldest employe in point af <br />----+ <br /> <br />Mfq 16, 1971 . EMPIRE MAGAZINE <br /> <br />.~, <br /> <br />" <br />