Laserfiche WebLink
<br />l'V <br />00 <br />CA <br />0) <br /> <br />.-.~,. :""'. <br />.~:-~~{J <br /> <br /> <br />"""'"'1.;;:'.,', <br />f '0 <br />y,c <br /> <br />.~~ <br />~ <br /> <br />. '::.'~<, <br />~:;t.":::) <br /> <br />Federal Register I Vol. 52. No, 86 I Tuesday, May 5. 1987 I Rules and Regulations <br /> <br />16739 <br /> <br />( <br /> <br />income. High salinity levels increase <br />operating costs. suppress crop growth. <br />and adversely affect crop yields, <br />Salinity levels above 1000 mg/L cause <br />severe crop production problems <br />because of the need for specialized and' <br />costly Irriga tion management practices. <br />The 'rec-omrnended safe-drinking <br />s'tandard for salinity concentration is <br />500 mg/I.. Concentrations above 500 mg/ <br />L; therefore. add to treatment costs for <br />municipal, industrial and residential <br />homeowners. add to the waste <br />. tr~almimt costs, and reduce or preclude <br />the reuse of the water supply. <br />The long term average annual saJini~y <br />co'ncentration of the-Colorado River <br />varies from about 50 mg/L in the <br />headwaters to about 850 mL/gat <br />Imperial Darn in Arizona. If no <br />correcfive action is taken; the USDI <br />estimates that future salinity levels in . <br />the Colorado River will reach about 963 <br />mg/L at Imperial Dam in the year 2010 . <br />as additional upstream industrial <br />residential and agricuJtural development <br />takes place. It has been estimated by <br />USDI that irrigated agriculture <br />contributes about 37 percent of the t:>tal <br />salt load to the Color-ado River above <br />the [mperial Dam. Generally. on-farm <br />irrigation and water distril;lution <br />systems. especially in the Upper Basin. . <br />"are not efficient and. therefore. have a <br />high level of surfa-ce runoff. excessive <br />deep percolation. and high amounts of <br />seepage from irrigation canals. and <br />laterals. Excessive deep percolation <br />from over.irrigation and seepage from. <br />distribu.tion systems leaches salts. from <br />the soil and underlyiQg geologic <br />, formations into the river. <br />There aM {lpproxi_rriatelY,1.:miUion <br />acres, or irrigated cropland in 17 <br />identified ,salt SQurce" uni ts In the <br />Colorado Basin: Teil onhese units <br />- presently are, considered feasible . <br />sa,linHy control project areas from a <br />cost-effective standpoint for inclusion in <br />. the CRSC Program. These ten units <br />could require conservation treatment on <br />as_ much as 700.000 acres of irrigated <br />cropland. . <br /> <br />Statutory Requirements <br /> <br />The Colorado River Basin Salinity <br />Control Act, as amended (43 U,S,C, 1571 <br />et seg.), {hereinafter referred to as the <br />"Act") addresses certain salinity control <br />i.sues. Title I of tho Act relates 10: (1) <br />the maintenance of the water 'Quality <br />(salinity concentrations) standard under <br />the agreement of August 30. 1973. <br />(?v1inute 242 of the- IntF-mationa! <br />Boundary and Water Commission. <br />United State. and Mexico) concluded <br />pursuant to the Water Treaty of <br />February 3, 1944 (59 Stat. 1219), with <br />respect to water delivered to Mexico. <br /> <br />. and (2) a program for improving <br />irrigation efficiences and redui::ing <br />highly saline irrigation drainage return <br />flows from the Wellton.Mohawk <br />Irrigation and Drainage District. Title'I <br />of the Act al.o autborizes the USDI to <br />design and construct a large <br />desalinization plant to treat excess _ <br />irrigation drainage return flows from the <br />Wellton-Mohawk area, <br />Title II of the Act (43 U,S.C. 1592) <br />deals specifically witb the salinity <br />concentrations in the Colorado Ri....er <br />above Irnperial Dam and _provides the <br />controls necessary to meet United <br />States water quality (salinity <br />concentration) standards for salinity <br />established and adopted by the seven <br />basin States and approved by the <br />Environmental Protection Agency [EPA). <br />The Secretary of the Interior is <br />au'thorized to undertake various <br />investigations and studies to determine <br />the nature of salt loading problems. <br />potential-saHnity control solutions. and. <br />costs. The Secretary of Interior also is <br />authorized to construct certain salinity <br />control projects. USDI investigations or <br />construction projects. however. do not <br />address on-farrn salinity control. Title II <br />of the Act directed the Secretary of tbe . <br />Interior. the Administrator of EPA. and <br />. the Secretary of Agriculture to cooperate <br />and coordinate their activities to carry <br />out the objectives of Title II, <br />The major -program areas that- have <br />beeri addressed by USDA agencies are: <br />{ll Irrigation salt source area studies <br />. [Soil Conservation Service (SCS)J; (2) <br />. implementation technical assistance <br />(SCS): (3) implementation co.t-.haring . <br />assistance_-[Agricultural Stabilization <br />and Conservation Service (ASCS)]: (4) <br />.extension education [Extension Service <br />. [ES)], (5) research and demonstration <br />[Agricultural Researcb Service (ARS), <br />Cooperative State Research Service <br />(CSRSJ]; and (6) monitoring and <br />evaluation (SCS). SCS has conducted <br />irrigation salt source area studies in <br />accordance with the provision of Pub, L. <br />83--566, .ection 6, 88 Stat, 668 (16 U,S,C, <br />1008), Some of tbesestudies have <br />resulted in published USDA Salinity <br />Control Reports identifying salt source <br />areas-and salt load estimates and <br />evaluating treatment alternatives with <br />respect to the benefits of .aIt load <br />'reduction. These studies recommended <br />implementation plans and projected <br />their costs. ASCS provides cost-share <br />assistance under the Agricultural <br />Conservation.Program (ACP) to assist <br />producers to improve on-farm irrigation <br />practices. These USDA agency programs <br />have been effective in assisting with 01'.- <br />farm salinity control but have been <br />limited in scope, The ACP annual <br /> <br />paymentlimitatiori of $3,500 to <br />indiviqual program participants has <br />been 8. major obstacle to the <br />repfacel!1ent or reorganization of costly <br />irrigation structures and practices. The <br />eligibility re'quirements for participants. <br />land. and 'irrigation districts under ACP <br />l)as also presented limitations to <br />effective' on.farm salinity control efforts,' <br />To ~)Vercome these problems. section <br />202(c) of the Act was added by Pub, L, <br />9a.;..S69 to authorizes the SecretarY of <br />Agriculture to establish a voluntary <br />cooperative on-,farm salinity control <br />program to improve on.farm water <br />management and reduce watershed <br />erosion on non.Federallands and lands <br />under.the control of the USDA. In <br />implementing the CRSC Program, the <br />Act provides that the Secretary shall <br />give preference to those cost-effective <br />projects' or s~lf~contained portions of <br />. projects which redu!=es salinity at the <br />least Federal cost per unit of salinity <br />reduction', <br />This interim rule sets forth the terms <br />and conditions of such program. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />General. This interim rule sets forth <br />the terms and conditions of the <br />Colorade> River Salini\}'i:ontrol (CRSC) . <br />Program. Undet: the int~nm rule. county <br />ASC ,committliles (COe) may enter into <br />CRSC Contracts with individuals or . <br />entities that have control of land <br />identified. in USDA Salinity Control <br />Reports as land t,hat is cQptributing to <br />the .alt loading of the Colorado River, <br />Under ,these contracts. ASeS will agree <br />to share the cost with the participant of <br />establishing necessary salinity reduction <br />practices on eligible land controlled by <br />. the _participant. In return for the c08t- ' <br />share payme'nts; a 'participant must <br />agree to carryout a cost-eff,ective <br />salinity control plan developed for the <br />pl:l.rticipant's-land. The salinity control <br />plan includes the salinity reduction <br />practicers] that must be installed on the <br />participant's land,as well as a schedule <br />of completion dates for the installation <br />of such practices. An individual or entity <br />that participates in the CRSC program <br />may also be required to enter into <br />Operation and Maintenance agreements <br />with COC,. <br />Operation and l-.1ainter.ance <br />agreements shall be designed to ensure <br />that the participant rnaintains <br />established salinity reduction practices <br />for a specified period of time determined <br />to be necessary to achieve the desired <br />level of salinity control. <br />USDA salinity cantral reparts, The <br />Soil Conservation Service (SCS), on <br />behalf of the Secretary and in <br />consultation wilh the Department of <br /> <br />-~ <br /> <br />