Laserfiche WebLink
<br />01':12""" ) <br />u ,.b~ "; <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />- 5 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />involve management of public waters. Highway construction affects water <br />flow and can provide for impoundment of water and erosion protection, <br />University experiment stations, extension services and engineering de- <br />partments do extensive water resource research and public education work. <br />Planning and development agencies do water resource studies to assist in <br />locating industries and maintaining water supplies. Other examples could <br />be cited. These programs make a significant contribution to the total <br />water resource development and regulation programs of a state, It is, <br />however, beyond the scope of the present paper to go in to any detail re- <br />garding the work of these agencies. <br /> <br />Some Major Future Problems <br /> <br />At a prior Missouri Basin Inter-Agency Committee meeting -- the <br />one held March 20 last year at St. Joseph, Missouri -- Irving Fox of Re- <br />sources for the Future raised the issue I want to consider now. The ques- <br />tion we face in the water resource field was expressed as follows: "How, <br />in this complex society, can we continue to realize the benefits which we <br />have accepted as accruing from local people making the decisions and tak- <br />ing the responsibility for the affairs which directly affect them?" In <br />considering the increasing federal activities in several fields of water <br />resource administration traditionally considered to be the domain of <br />state, local or private agencies, he concluded that the states could, if <br />they wish, maintain important responsibilities in all of these areas. <br />What is involved is for the states to retain the initiative by maintaining <br />the capacity to make their own decisions and assist localities in making <br />decisions even where new or expanded federal programs are involved. <br /> <br />I would like to consider four areas in which the states may <br />have to take positive steps to expand their activities if they are to <br />retain this initiative. Two of these areas of increasing importance cut <br />across all other water resource activities: the collection and analysis <br />of basic information regarding water resources and comprehensive planning <br />and coordination of programs. The other two are more specific areas: <br />the development of water supply facilities and pollution control. <br /> <br />Basic Water Resource Data and Research <br /> <br />One of the most pressing problems facing the states in their ef- <br />~Iforts to expand their water resource programs to meet new needs is the <br />lack of adequate basic information about present and foreseeable water <br />supplies and the demands that will be put on them. That there is this <br />lack is hardly a new or startling discovery. Yet it needs to be empha- <br />sized again, since the inadequacies in basic information are still <br />present. This particular area where added state efforts would seem to <br />be necessary is considered first not necessarily because it is most im- <br />portant but because it is fundamental to all others. <br /> <br />If wise decisions are to be made regarding present operations <br />land future developments of water resource programs of all kinds, there <br />must first be available sufficient information regarding the physical <br />basis for the decisions. Other factors, such as population growth and <br />movement, industrial expansion or modification, new agricultural tech- <br />niques, competing demands and the desires and wishes of the people of <br />