Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ~PENJ)1X D <br /> Municipal Waste Treatment in the Missouri River Basin <br /> Total Treatment of Waste Produced Per cent <br /> No. of Estimated Population Per cent Waste <br /> Commun~ l'opllia- Equivalent Per cent Per cent Other & Reduction <br /> ities With tion of Waste Un- Per cent Inter- Per cent Undeter- H--by <br />State Sewers Served Produced{a) treated Primary mediate Secondary mined Treatment (b) <br />Colorado 84 803,690 1,091,310 .7 1,5 79.4 15.5 .3 41.7 <br />Iowa 131 322,305 378,210 49.8 2.2 .... 48.0 . .. 37.0 ,.f.~?; <br />Kansas 144 486,340 716,020 50.0, 13.3 36.4 .4 28.6 "t;!) <br />'" <br />Minnesota 10 12,546 '. ,4,515 .. ~ . 48.6 .. . 51.4 ,.. 49.5 <br />Missouri 146 889.134 1,365,949 80.0 2.8 .'. . 17.3 .. . 13.8 <br /> 0 <br />Montana 93 205,840 207,415 37.7 43.6 5.1 5.6 8.1 21.6 0 <br />Nebraska 242 725,801 2,106,096 78.5 2.5 N <br />.7 ,18.1 .2 14.2 cn <br />North Dakota 98 145,209 201,654 32.4 30.3 24.5 ~,;-.. <br />. .. 12.8 39.2 ~ ..; <br />South Dakota 158 290,010 510,765 10.1 8.2 .. . 80.8 .9 67.5 <br />Wyoming 57 165,530 165,780 41.9 17.3 9.0 26.7 5.1 35.2 <br /> <br />$Ol1l1ce: <br /> <br />,()~~~: <br />"Waste Treatment in the Missouri River Basin," Paper by Ralph Porges, Robert A. Taft Sanitary Engineering Center\;~ <br />United States Public Health Service; Cincinnati, Ohio. April 15, 1957 <br /> <br />(a) This figure includes population equivalents of industrial wastes discharged to municipal sewerage. <br /> <br />(b) Figures in this column show the percentage difference between total population equivalent of waste produced and <br />waste discharged which indicates the percentage reduction in waste load by municipal sewage treatment plants. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />. <br />