Laserfiche WebLink
<br />----- <br />I <br />I <br />I a <br />:,") <br />N <br /> N <br />I to <br />c.c <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />'. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />MISSOURI <br /> <br />The State of Miasouri does not neceasarily agree or disagree <br />with all conclusions because of the limited State data available. <br />As State water planning work progresses, refined data and projec- <br />tions will be available and the State of Missouri can better <br />evaluate the results of the National Water Assessment. <br /> <br />Springfield and Joplin areas are recognized to have major water <br />resource problems which'need further attention. <br /> <br />It is recommended that all future basin planning activities of <br />this type present data on a State-by-State basis to make the basin <br />projections and conclusions more useable to individual States. <br /> <br />NEW MEXICO <br /> <br />The Modified Central Case (MCC) data provided by WRC were com- <br />piled for aggregated subareas which in most cases ignored state <br />boundaries and hydrologic areas within states. Comparison of SRF <br />and MCC data in New Mexico could not be made, thus, differences could <br />not be identified. For the most part, MCC data hsve no useful appli- <br />cation in New Mexico in providing economic, water and related land <br />resource statistical information. <br /> <br />Existing laws, regulations, and compacts thst relate to water <br />use within states or between states appear to be ignored. Stste laws <br />and interstate compacts affect present and future use of water supplies <br />and both are important in determining availability of these supplies <br />for various uses. <br /> <br />The State of New Mexico recommands future studies include state <br />data and consider legal constraint which effect the use of water <br />supplies. <br /> <br />During Activity 3, Phase II, two Group A problems in the AWR <br />Region in New Mexico were defined. Problem No. 1 noted several <br />problem issues and effects which sre common throughout the area and <br />Problem No. 2 is concerned with dwindling groundwater supplies in <br />areas where pumping exceeds recharge snd wster levels sre being lower~d~ <br /> <br />Problem No.1. Common problems throughout the area are limited <br />surfac-e~wa~er-Bupplies; flooding in urban and rural areas, erosion of <br />the landscape; siltation and sedimentation in stream channels and <br />reservoir areas. <br /> <br />17 <br />