My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08195
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08195
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:30:30 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:48:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.766
Description
Gunnison River General
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
4/3/1952
Author
Policy-Review Commit
Title
Gunnison River Storage-Memos-Policy and Review Committee - Report of Policy and Review Committee - Gunnison River Storage to the Colorado Water Conservation Board
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />M')"1J8 <br />,_ .... .J.... <br /> <br />^ FffiilD IX A <br /> <br />OUNiaSON RIVER BASIN STUDY <br /> <br />The followinf, is a brief of a study made by George Cory of I,jontrose, <br />and F. J.i. Peterson of Delta, Colorado, representing the counties of ihontrose <br />and Delta, respectively, on the Policy and Review Committee of the Colorado <br />i'later Conservation Board. <br /> <br />The studies here presented in brief are the results of three months <br />of labor and the expenditure of over five thousand (;,5,000.00) dollars. <br />As space ~ill not permit inclusion of substantiating material, only the facts <br />will be set forth. Any member of the Committee desiring the substantiating <br />material concerning any given fact or figure here rresented may request such <br />material at any legal meeting of the Committee. <br /> <br />Purpose of the Study <br /> <br />H.S there has been presented heretofore only the Engiroeerinf Study of <br />the Gunr.ison Basin and a certain amount of data in opposition to the con- <br />struction of the Curecanti Project, the authors of the Gunnison iiiver Basin <br />Study attempted to approach the problem from a different vie~~oint. This <br />approach ~as taken because of the belief of the majority of the people of <br />Delta and Montrose Counties that from an over-all standpoint the construction <br />of the Curecanti Project and participating projects will be of great economic <br />benefit to the area as a '"hole and to the Nation. <br /> <br />ihr. Peterson and ,"r. Cory are fully aware of certain disadvantages to <br />a few residents of the U?per Gunnison Valley, but we feel that in principle, <br />these disadvantages are more in the nature of sentimental damages. The ad- <br />vantages by construction of the Curecanti project far exceed the disadvant- <br />ages. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />From the outset it was apparent that the purpose of the Curecanti <br />Reservoir and participating projects, and the phases to be studied, would <br />fall in the follovdng catagories: <br /> <br />A, Holdover Storage; B, Irrigation; C, Electric Power Generation, <br />D, looustry; E, General i:conomy; F, Recreation; G, Fish and '\':ild- <br />life; and H, National Defense. <br /> <br />All of the catagories were briefed by y~. Cory at the first meeting of <br />the Committee in Denver, COlorado, Septe~ber 28, 1951, with the exception of <br />Fish and hildlife. This article "'as omitted because the nature of the article <br />did not fulfill the request by the chairman of the Committee as to the type <br />of statements to be discussed at the meeting, but in all prooability will be <br />discussed fully in later meetinrs. <br /> <br />Article A - Holdover Storage <br /> <br />Holdover Storage is described under the four following points: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.