Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />J <br />I <br />Ii <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />, <br />I <br />" <br />I <br />t <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />UPPER COLORADO RIVER RECOVERY IMPLEMENTA TION PROGRAM <br />COORDINATED RESERVOIR OPERATIONS <br />1997 OPERATIONS REPORT <br /> <br />I. Introduction <br /> <br />The Water Acquisition Committee (WAC) of the Upper Colorado River Endangered Fish <br />Recovery Program (the Program) proposed the Coordinated Reservoir Operations Study <br />(CROS), in 1994. This is the fIrst year of joint reservoir operations with the reservoir operators <br />[Colorado River Water Conservation District, Denver Water, Northern Colorado Water <br />Conservancy District, Southeastern Water Conservancy District, City of Aurora and City of <br />Colorado Springs and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Bureau)], State Engineer's Office (SEa), <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB), the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the <br />National Weather Service (NWS). The objectives were identification and evaluation of potential <br />opportunities to coordinate bypasses of inflows from various reservoirs to enhance habitat in the <br />IS-Mile Reach of the Colorado River. These bypasses would likely have passed through the <br />reservoirs during the runoff period. Ccoordinated reservoir operations simply moves those <br />bypasses to the peak of the runoff hydro graph. The focus of this effort is to enhance spring peak <br />flows, which are important to spawning and improvement of aquatic food sources. Coordination <br />and modifIcation of operations were voluntary and occurred within current authorizations and <br />guidelines and without affecting project yields to federal and non-federal reservoirs. <br /> <br />The initial study began in March 1995 with the establishment of a core study team representing <br />large reservoir owner/operators and major water management entities in the basin. The fIrst <br />efforts of the team were to clarify the objectives of the study, create a Memorandum of <br />Understanding committing the entities to the study effort, and develop an outline of tasks to <br />guide the direction of the study effort towards a coordinated reservoir operation process. <br /> <br />This initial study provided the following: <br /> <br />. Analysis of potential operational alternatives <br />. IdentifIcation of constraints <br />· Listing of issues to be addressed by the Recovery Implementation Program (RIP) <br />· Process of coordination to enhance flows in the Reach. <br /> <br />One of the early efforts of the team was to address creation of a unifIed accounting system for <br />the Colorado River to account for contributions and facilitate coordination of releases. Current <br />accounting on the river is done in a somewhat fragmented manner between major operating <br />entities. The team is currently developing a unifIed accounting system with the Water Division 5 <br />Engineer's offIce and in coordination with the Colorado River Decision Support System <br />(CRDSS) effort to ensure that accounting logic is consistent. <br /> <br />Major facilities with potential for coordination have been identifIed and a list of parameters <br />influencing their operations has been assembled. These parameters include physical and <br />operational parameters, traditional operations, current commitments, and authorization, <br />organizational and legal guidelines for the facilities. This effort has helped defIne the <br />institutional boundaries and constraints on coordination and discretionary operations. <br /> <br />3 <br />