My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08192
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08192
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:30:30 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:48:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.38.A
Description
Coordinated Reservoir Operations
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
1/1/1997
Author
CWCB
Title
1997 Coordinated Reservoir Operations Bypasses for Endangered Fish - Annual Summary of Operations for 1997 to Benefit the Endangered Fishes of the Upper Colorado River Basin
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I, <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />between runoff and baseflow periods. Rates of sedimentation were low during summer and fall following <br />runoff and depth to-embeddedness remained fairly constant through the base flow period. The two years <br />of initial sampling represents a period of time when both reaches were freshly cleaned of fine sediment <br />and the data should provide a good baseline for future monitoring. In addition, the USFWS also <br />conducted its Standardized Monitoring Program. <br /> <br />IX. Issues to Address <br /> <br />. Runoff and Flow Prediction Imnrovements <br /> <br />At present there are 23 SNOTEL sites located in the Upper Colorado River Basin. The sites range in <br />elevation from 8,700 feet above MSL to I 1,400 feet above MSL. These sites provide a fairly good <br />indication of what the snow pack is. However, additional information on how melting of the snow pack <br />translates into stream flows would be helpful. The rough rule of thumb is that when the snow water <br />equivalent at the SNOTEL sites reaches 10 inches you are at or very near the peak runoff. Refinement of <br />this approach and better estimates of the melt rate would be beneficial. <br /> <br />The NWS added Extended Streamflow Prediction (ESP) forecasting for the Cameo Gage during 1997. <br />This added capability should greatly help coordinated reservoir operations during the 1998 runoff. <br />Furthermore, additional improvements to the extended forecast outlook would be quite helpful and <br />provide both improved and additional data for use in the ESP model. <br /> <br />Finally, improved communications among all reservoir operators and water administration officials would <br />help. As a result, the State of Colorado will be implementing the water administration tool as part of <br />CRDSS in 1999. This tool will help distribute real time information concerning stream flows and <br />reservoir operations to everyone as soon as it becomes available. The tool may be ready for use in 1998, <br />but likely not until the runoff season is over. <br /> <br />. Coordination with the Colorado Flood Task Force <br /> <br />The Colorado Flood Task Force continually evaluates the flood potential around the state during the <br />runoff season. The Task Force employees a private consultant (Henz-Kelly) to provide extended weather <br />outlooks and also identify areas of potential flood threats. Alternatively, information on reservoir <br />operations may be useful to the Task Force. The exchange of information between the coordinated <br />reservoir operations group and the Flood Task Force should be encouraged. In addition, the <br />documentation of any flooding that may occur is of interest to both groups and coordination of this effort <br />could help stretch limited financial resources farther. <br /> <br />. Flood Warnings and "Pinch Points" on the River Affecting Coordinated Reservoir Operations <br /> <br />Several stream gages on the river have elevation levels identified on them at which flood warnings are <br />issued. However, the State of Colorado and NWS do not always agree on what that elevation should be. <br />The Coordinated Reservoir Operations Group would like to see one set of flood elevation levels identified <br />for each stream gage upon which both the State of Colorado and NWS agree. <br /> <br />Stream flows during 1997 approached or slightly exceeded bank-full capacity at many locations. Thus, <br />operations in 1997 defined some of the limitations on Coordinated Reservoir Operations. Photographs <br />showing flooding along the Colorado River in the Kremmling, Fruita and Cameo areas during 1997, and a <br />map of these pictures are provided below. <br /> <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.