Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />T-'1' <br />'$ <br />I. <br />I <br /> <br />~. <br /> <br />. <br />~. <br /> <br />""-- <br /> <br />1. INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />The Colorado River Recovery Program Director and Water Acquisition Committee have identified <br />a need to better define the requirements, appropriate methodologies, and levels of effort for a <br />sediment monitoring program to help define habitat requirements for endangered native fish in <br />the Yampa, Little Snake, and Green Rivers. To meet that need, an independent peer review panel <br />was formed to review historical data, review the status of ongoing data collection efforts, identify <br />sediment issues as they relate to recovery of endangered fishes, and develop recommendations <br />for future sediment work to support Program efforts. The peer review panel was established under <br />the direction of Mr. George Smith, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS), and consisted of the <br />following individuals: <br /> <br />Dr. Bob Mussetter, Mussetter Engineering, Inc. (Workshop Coordinator) <br />Dr. Mike Harvey, Mussetter Engineering, Inc. (MEI) <br />Dr. Ned Andrews, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) <br />Mr. John Elliott, USGS <br />Mr. Paul Von Guerard, USGS <br />Dr. Jim O'Brien, FLO Engineering, Inc. <br /> <br />Other interested individuals who provided input to the panel included: <br /> <br />Mr. Ed Wick, National Park Service <br />Mr. Bill Fullerton, FLO Engineering, Inc. <br />Mr. Henry Maddux, USFWS <br />Mr. Dave Merritt, Colorado River Water Conservation District <br /> <br />To support the peer review panel's work, Mussetter Engineering, Inc. (MEI) identified and <br />summarized existing sediment and river channel data for the Green, Yampa, and Little Snake <br />Rivers. The data summary was subsequently reviewed by other members of the peer review <br />panel. This report represents the final version of the data summary which incorporates <br />appropriate changes and additions based on the review comments. <br /> <br />2. EXISTING DATA <br /> <br />The data contained in this document were compiled from a variety of sources, including published <br />USGS data from established stream gages, published papers and reports, and unpublished data <br />obtained directly from individuals who have performed work in the area of interest. The river <br />reaches that were of specific interest to the peer review panel included the Green River from the <br />confluence with the Colorado River upstream to Flaming Gorge Dam, the Yampa River from the <br />confiuence with the Green River upstream to the USGS gage near Maybell, Colorado (USGS gage <br />09251000), and the downstream approximately 12 miles of the Little Snake River from the mouth <br />to just upstream of Powder Wash Road (Plate 1). For clarity of presentation, the data were <br />divided into two categories: (1) published data collected on a regular basis at established USGS <br />stream gages, and (2) other data collected as part of individual studies or study programs. <br /> <br />2.1 Data from USGS Stream Gages <br /> <br />Tables 1 through 4 summarize the available instantaneous peak flow, mean daily flow, <br />suspended sediment load, and bed material gradations that were collected at established USGS <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />Mussetter Engineering. Inc. <br />