Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />~"'il' I nC! <br />I):'" l.,."i '.' j <br /> <br />the District decided to investigate whether alternatives to additional nitrification/denitrification <br />facilities existed, Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (COM) was retained by the District to identify and <br />evaluate alternatives to nitrification to meet Segment 15 water quality standards. This Nitrification <br />Alternatives Study involved the development of a detailed water quality model of Segment 15, which <br />was used in evaluating the performance of potential "non-traditional" alternatives, <br /> <br />WATER OUALITY MODELING <br /> <br />Interrelated physical, chemical, and biological factors influence dissolved oxygen and ammonia <br />concentrations in any given river location, These include hydrologic characteristics, river channel <br />geometry, oxygen producing photosynthetic activity, and oxygen consuming biological respiration and <br />nitrification processes, Bacteria in the river water column and sediments convert organic maner to <br />carbon dioxide and water via respiration and convert ammonia to nitrate (nitrification) while <br />consuming large quantities of oxygen from the water. <br /> <br />In order to simulate river response to various non-traditional alternatives, a specialized water quality <br />computer model was constructed for Segment 15 by incorporating the Colorado Ammonia and EPA's <br />STREAM DO IV models. The resulting model, called the Segment 15 Water Quality Model, is <br />supported by a large data base and is considered to be the best simulation to date of water quality in <br />Segment 15. Future additions to the data base will strengthen the reliability of this model. <br /> <br />..Modeling revealed that DO, not ammonia toxicity, was the limiting water quality parameter and was <br />JIlost critical during July through September, Figure ES-2 illustrates an expected 24 hour daily <br />average DO protile along Segment 15, with a Central Plant effluent flow of 185 mgd (North Complex <br />..fully nitrifying, the South Complex operating in a secondary treatment mode, and the river at its <br />lowest flow condition), It is important to note that for this srudv, the regulatory agencies agreed that <br />a 24-hour average DO would be used to evaluate compliance with the current water quality standards, <br />As shown in Figure ES-2, the 5.0 mglL daily average DO standard is expected to be violated over a <br />four mile reach extending from 88th Avenue to below the Fulton Ditch diversion and again over a six <br />mile reach from approximately 160th Avenue (Brighton) north to Fort Lupton, The modeling results <br />also indicated that with full nitrification of the Central Plant at its design capacity of 185 mgd, DO <br /> <br />D-4 <br />