Laserfiche WebLink
<br />COLORADO RIVER BASIN <br /> <br />,. <br /> <br />RANGELAND SALINITY CONTROL PROJECT <br /> <br />o STATEOFUT~ <br />l\;I <br />~ RASELY, Robert C., 1991, US Department of Agriculture, Soil <br />~ Conservation Service, Salt Lake City, Utah <br /> <br /> <br />ABSTRACT <br /> <br />Historically, salinity control work in the Colorado River Basin' has <br />been accomplished solely by irrigation water management projects. <br />Rangeland watershed salinity control was determined to be too <br />expensive due to the very large number of acres of rangeland within <br />the basin. Soil Conservation Service watershed planning wor~ has <br />shown that severely eroding rangeland can be successfully tr$ated <br />in a cost effective manner using the principle of resource p~oblem <br />targeting. Studies have also shown that most of the watersheds <br />will haVe approximately 5% to 15% of the surface area in sev~rely <br />eroding condition. and in need of improved conservationtreat~ent. <br /> <br />A two phase project was implemented that inventoried watersheds in <br />the State of Utah that are in the Colorado River Basin. Phase Iof <br />the project involved an interdisciplinary team of specialists from <br />the US Soil Conservation Service (SCS), US Bureau of Land <br />Management (BLM) and US Geological Survey. The project ~ad 8:," <br />steering.committee composed of many federal and state agencies <br />interested in control of salt and sediment nonpoint source . <br />pollution in the Colorado.River Basin. The project was supported <br />by the Colorado River Basin Salinity Forum. <br /> <br />The 218 watersheds in the Colorado River Basin within the state of <br />Utah were inventoried for various resource parameters includ~ng <br />potential sediment yield, potential salt yield, rangeland coi').dition <br />and annual precipitation range. This inventory gave eachwat:ershed <br />a rating on a scale of one to twelve with the highest ratings in <br />those watersheds most in need of conservation planning to control' <br />offsite nonpoint source sediment and salt problems. The ste~ring <br />committee and cooperating agencies identified eight watershe~s for <br />detailed planning in Phase II of the project based on the Phase I <br />parameters and individual agency needs. <br /> <br />Phase II of the project consisted of field inventories and r~ports <br />characterizing eight individual watersheds and was accomplisHed by <br />an augmented interdisciplinary team composed of the project team <br />and various field specialists from SCS and BLMfield offices with <br />planning responsibility within the watershed area. The Pacific <br />Southwest Interagency Committee (PSIAC) 1968 Sediment Yield <br />Procedure was revised and used to cHaracterize the sediment and <br />salt yields from individual geomorphic units within the target <br />watersheds. The Phase II procedure was accomplished in a four <br /> <br />, '.,:}, <br /> <br />'" <br />, <br />., <br /> <br />-1 <br /> <br />i <br />"3 <br /> <br />:f <br /> <br />