My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08076
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08076
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:30:04 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:45:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.100.50
Description
CRSP - Power Rates
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/25/1980
Author
USDOE/WAPA
Title
Environmental Assessment - Finding of No Significant Impact - Proposed CRSP Power Rate Adjustment
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />\ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The Pacific Southwest is one of the most rapidly developing areas in the <br />Nation, both industrially and populationwise. Colorado River water for <br />municipal and industrial purposes is supplied to approximately 130 incorporated <br />towns and other communities in this area with a population of about 10 <br />million people. This water supply, which totalled about 1,200,000 acre-feet <br />in 1968, ranges from a minor 'supplemental supply-for some entities to a <br />complete supply for others. <br /> <br />8. Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action: <br /> <br />1. Impacts on the social and economic environment: <br /> <br />As stated previously, under DOE procedures the need for an environmental <br />statement to support a PMA rate adjustment will depend on five factors that' <br />will be discussed below. <br /> <br />A cursory analysis of the rate adjustment and its alternatives indicates that <br />it will have no effect on the cultural and/or recreational resources of the <br />Colorado River Basin. <br /> <br />a. Size of increase <br /> <br />From the review of the data developed from the public forums and <br />comments, a revised rate adjustment was proposed. The proposed rate <br />is a 25.8'percent increase or 1.69 mills/kWh at a 58.2 percent load <br />factor.. . <br /> <br />Throughout the public involvement program described in Section VI of this EA <br />the issue of apportionment of funds to the states in accordance with Section <br />5(e) of P.L. 84-485 was raised. This apportionment is embodied in the <br />alternatives discussed in this EA. Studies indicate that the proposed rate <br />increase could be reduced to about 15.1 percent (instead of 25.8 percent) <br />under the different apportionment scheme. This is because the present <br />apportionment scheme, as mentioned in Section IV, results in a credit to some <br />states in excess of amounts required for currently authorized participating <br />projects; this excess which is referred to as surplus-surplus will accrue <br />to the Basin Fund. Western will follow the historic interpretation of <br />the law (P.L. 84-485 5(e)) regarding the handling of revenues. <br /> <br />b. The percentage total requirements supplied by CRSP <br /> <br />The total electric energy consumed in the CRSP marketing area for <br />Fiscal Year 1977 is compared with the amount supplied by the CRSP in <br />the following tabulation: <br /> <br /> Tota 1 Energy CRSP Energy CRSP % of <br /> Consumed Supplied Total <br />Arizona 26,734,766 903,630 3.4 <br />Colorado 20,700,423 1,537,356 7.4 <br />New Mexico 8,770,072 856,642 9.8 <br />Nevada 5,379,273 200,661 3.7 <br />Utah 12,726,480 1,550,451 12.2 " <br />Wyomi ng 6,564,699 525,096 8.0 <br />Total 80,875,713 5,573,836 6.9 <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.