Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Off-Farm - In the Littlefield area, the off-farm distribution <br />systems were considered and improvements are recommended as part of <br />the onfarm program. <br /> <br />A larger sand trap or desilting basin is needed in the Mesquite <br />Canal. The existing trap does not function properly, Improvements <br />for the Mesquite Irrigation Company system include replacing about <br />300 feet of concrete lining, repairing the overshot structure 0,4 miles <br />west of the Mesquite-Bunkerville division box, and replaCing the 48 <br />inch CMP flume (45 feet long) at Abbott Wash, <br /> <br />The major distribution system improvement needed is the lining <br />of approximately 13,850 feet of the Bunkerville Canal, This would <br />reduce seepage by about 885 acre-feet per year, Nineteen turnouts <br />would need to be reinstalled when the ditch is lined, A sand trap <br />located near the river diversion structure is needed, River channel <br />stabilization measures are needed to improve the diversion site, <br /> <br />Repair of about 50 feet of existing concrete ditch and two overshots <br />are oeeded for the Bunkerville Irrigation Company system, <br /> <br />A permanent diversion structure is needed at Riverside, Nevada., The <br />present canal system needs to be maintained for the Riverside area. The <br />diversion canal system requires a large stilling basin, turnout structures, <br />and streambank protection to prevent river overflow damage to the main <br />ditch, Lining the 9,240 foot main ditch would reduce seepage an estimated <br />570 acre-feet annually, An alternative is installation of a pumping plant <br />in lieu of a diversion structure. This would eliminate 7,000 feet of the <br />main canal. However, additional energy costs for a pumping plant is an <br />adverse effect to be considered. <br /> <br />Annual repair of the present Riverside Irrigation Group system in- <br />cludes rebuilding the diversion structure, and removal of sediments from <br />the main canal, and replacing washed out sections after minor flood <br />flows. <br /> <br />Problems and Needs Associated With Erosion and Sedimentation <br /> <br />Average annual sheet, rill and gully erosion varies from less <br />than one to greater than ten tons-per-acre-per-year, (See Figure 14 - <br />Erosion Areas). Teo percent of the stream channel has erosion io excess <br />of 1,000 tons per mile. Sheet and rill erosion account for 20 to 30 per <br />cent of the sediment yield. Erosion of gullies, washes, streambanks and <br />channel bottoms account for the other 70 to 80 percent of sediment <br />yield. Sediment yield from Virgin River drainage above Littlefield <br />averages three million tons annually based on 20 years of gage data, <br />The estimated salt loading resulting from erosion in this reach is <br />based on an analysis of surface water data, Annual suspended sediment, <br />indicated by the gage at Littlefield, Arizona, has varied from less <br />than one million to over seven millions tons, A flood event on December <br />6 and 7, 1966 produced 3.1 million tons of sediment and 110,000 tons of <br />salt by erosion in the watershed above the gaging station, <br /> <br />~~~ <br /> <br />;, i I ~. ,., (l ,) <br />,,'JI.. c.v4 <br /> <br />34 <br />