My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08073
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08073
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:30:02 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:45:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8277.100
Description
Salinity Projects Not Located in Colorado - Colorado River Salinity Control Forum
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
9/1/1981
Title
Salinity Control and Environmental Assessment - part 1
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Ground Water - In Virgin Valley ground water is pumped for irrigation, <br />livestock and domestic use. Ground water samples from wells reflect the <br />presence of geologic formations containing soluble and moderately soluble <br />minerals, such as halite (sodium chloride) and gypsum (calcium sulfate). <br />Sodium and calcium are the principle positive ions found in the ground <br />water while sulfate and bicarbonate are the predominant negative ions. <br /> <br />Water Use - About seven percent of the Virgin River's flow is consumed <br />by irrigated agriculture in the reach of the river from Littlefield to <br />Riverside, Nevada. About five percent of the water is consumed by phreato- <br />phytes and evaporation. About 88 percent of the water flows through the <br />Virgin Valley program area. Depletions by phreatophyes and evaporation <br />are almost completely replaced by inflow from small intermittent streams. <br />The reuse of water in onfarm systems is minor. The effect of water reuse <br />on irrigation efficiency is small. The principal reuse is of return flow <br />from the Mesquite and Bunkerville areas which is rediverted for irrigation <br />at the Riverside area. There are about 7,400 acres of phreatophytes in the <br />Virgin River floodplain in Nevada, consisting mostly of saltcedar, some salt- <br />grass, saltbush, cottonwood, mesquite, willow and tules. Depth to water <br />ranges from 0 to 20 feet; but is mostly from one to five feet and varying <br />seasonally. Areal plant density is generally from 25 to 100 percent. An <br />estimated 10,000 acre-feet of water is used in the program area primarily <br />by 2,750 acres which are dominated by trees, shrubs and persistent emergents. <br />An additional evaporative loss of 2,000 acre-feet occurs on open water (channel) <br />wetland areas. <br /> <br />Water Budget - Water supply and depletion estimates for Virgin Valley <br />are summarized in Table 4, Water and Salt Budgets. Surface inflow and out- <br />flow have been measured at stream gages. The annual crop consumptive use <br />was determined from onfarm irrigation analyses. Surface and subsurface in- <br />flow between stream gages was estimated from a monthly analysis of concurrent <br />gage data. This estimate compares reasonably with the value used by the <br />State of Nevada, Water Resources-Reconnaissance Series, Report No. 51, (see <br />Bibliography). <br /> <br />Water Quality - Virgin River surface water salinity varies considerably <br />with the flow volume. During low flows in the summer and early fall months <br />the water is of poor quality due to high total dissolved solids (TDS). For <br />example, concentrations of salt at Littlefield gage ranged from 2,610 mg/l <br />on October 20, 1978 (mean daily discharge - 83 cfs) to 460 mg/l (mean daily <br />discharge - 1,570 cfs) on May 20, 1979. Concentrations of salt at the River- <br />side gage ranged from 3,770 mg/1 on October 10, 1978 (mean daily discharge _ <br />10 cfs) to 580 mg/l (mean daily discharge - 1,310 cfs) on May 21, 1979. <br />Typical chemical chemical compositions of surface water are shown in Table 5. <br />The variation in quality and flow makes it possible to apply better quality <br />spring time flows to soils to leach salt. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />The average concentration of minerals in ground water at the proposed <br />USBR barrier site near Lake Mead is about 4,000 mg/l based on laboratory <br />analysis of 56 samples. Table 6 contains the results of eight analyses that <br />are representative of ground water at the barrier site. Table 7 gives <br />typical compositions of local well water samples. Water quality measuring <br />station locations are shown on Figure 6. <br /> <br />OUG~67 <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.