My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP08062
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
8001-9000
>
WSP08062
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:30:00 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:44:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.43.A.2
Description
Grand Valley/Orchard Mesa
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
8/1/1997
Title
Final Environmental Assessment - Providing Fish Passage at the Grand Valley Irrigation Company Diversion Dam on the Colorado River
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />The Recovery Program participants realize, that if providing fish passage at the GVIC Diversion <br />is successful, two additional fish passageways would be considered upstream: one at the Price- <br />Stubb Dam and another at the Government Highline Diversion Dam. This EA is not intended to <br />serve as full NEP A compliance for these passageways because effective design concepts have not <br />been developed and it is uncertain whether those passageways would be constructed. It is <br />recognized, however, that should the additional structures be built, they would function in a <br />manner similar to the GVIC structure and, in the case of the Government Highline Diversion, <br />have similar operational concerns. The Price-Stubb Dam, while still blocking the river, has not <br />been used for irrigation diversions for almost 80 years. Certain environmental commitments are <br />included in this EA that would protect environmental resources and water uses, and, if the <br />upstream passageways are constructed in the future, would be applicable to those sites. <br />Additional NEP A compliance would be completed, as necessary, for the other two structures. <br />From a cumulative impact standpoint, if all three structures were constructed and worked <br />successfully, chances for recovering the fish between Palisade and Rifle would greatly improve. <br /> <br />If it is not possible to provide fish passage at the GVIC Diversion Dam, then there may be no <br />justification for further upstream passageways. <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.