Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />NEWSLETTER NO.2 <br /> <br />JANUARY 1982 <br /> <br />r;;;~. <br />/""'" - <br />'0' . C,.~ ./.> <br />//{if!fiJr:--.. ~- <br />/I/I? '--),/S.}f)..... <br />/(/1 c.;J'/ "7)~ I~~ <br />....1 "0. ""~] <br />'- 'f", ~....., <br />.;~ " ',., 'I <br />.. . ~ ), .. " ('!. <br />1...,,': ~'I.(.)'i;.,. ~ G,? i <br />. ..^. 'T1-10.O f <br />'-<r;ir. I. <br />". :r"Cl W47"~ <br />.1..11.,.., ..tr <br />"'O,q,o <br />!) <br /> <br />Diamond Fork Power System <br />Bonneville Unit <br />Central Utah Project <br /> <br />WHY BUILD THE DIAMOND FORK POWER SYSTEM? <br /> <br />Newsletter No.1 contained a discussion of the purpose <br />of Diamond Fork Power System and its relationship to other <br />units of the Central Utah Project. By way of a brief review, the <br />power system consists of that segment of the Bonneville <br />Unit extending from the eniarged Strawberry Reservoir to <br />near the confluence of Diamond Fork and Spanish Fork <br />Rivers. Various alternatives consisting of reservoirs, tunnels, <br />pipelines, and powerplants of differing sizes and locations <br />are being considered. <br />The Diamond Fork Power System will function as the final <br />link in the transbasin diversion, which will convey water from <br />the Uinta Basin through the Strawberry Aqueduct and Col- <br />lection System, down the Diamond Fork and SpaniSh Fork <br />Rivers drainage to the Bonneville Basin. The project water <br />supply of about 136,000 acre-feet, coupled with the 61,000 <br />acre-feet of present yield from the existing Strawberry Valley <br />Project. would result in an annual volume of 197,000 acre- <br />feet released through the system and made avaiiabie to the <br />populated areas of the Wasatch Front for municipal. indust- <br />rial, and agricultural uses. <br />In addition to the increase in usable water supplies men- <br />tioned above, the Diamond Fork Power System will develop <br />the hydroelectric power potential of the diverted Uinta Basin <br /> <br />water and existing Strawberry Valley Project water by utiliz- <br />ing the 2,600-foot elevation difference between Strawberry <br />Reservoir and Spanish Fork River. Energy generated by the <br />power system would be marketed throughout the Colorado <br />River Storage Project (CRSP) System. Several atternative <br />plans are being considered at this time and are briefly <br />described in this newsletter. <br /> <br />DIAMOND FORK POWER SVSTEM ALTERNATtVES <br /> <br />Three different alternatives are being investigated for the <br />Diamond Fork Power System. They are known as the Sixth <br />Water Flow Through Plan, Sixth Water Pumped Storage <br />Plan, and Fifth Water Pumped Storage Plan. The alternatives <br />are similar in that each transports 197,600 acre-feet of water <br />annually from the enlarged Strawberry Reservoir through a <br />series of tunnels, pipelines, and reservoirs to the Wasatch <br />Aqueduct and Spanish Fork River near the confluence of the <br />Diamond Fork and Spanish Fork Rivers. These alternatives <br />differ in the number, size, and location of the dams, tunnels, <br />powerplants, and other features. The three alternatives also <br />differ in their projected costs and benefits. While hydro- <br />power generation is a part of each plan, the Sixth Water Flow <br />Through Plan has no pumped storage capability. <br />