Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />000155 <br /> <br />NATIONAL FOREST RESERVED WATER RIGHT CLAIMS <br />COLORADO WATER DIVISION 2 <br />TECHNICAL WORKGROUP <br />STREAM SURVEY <br /> <br />SURVEY DATE: Aut!ust2l.1996 <br />STREAM NAME: Black Cloud Creek <br /> <br />STREAM NO: 65D <br /> <br />HYDROLOGY: <br />Drainage Area at Downstream Confluence: <br />Stream Gaging Stations: <br />Average Flows: Period of Record: <br />oct nov dec jan feb mar apr may Jun juJ aug sep Total <br /> <br />cfs <br />AF <br /> <br />NATURAL ENVIRONMENT: <br />Special WildlifelFish Habitat: <br />Threatened. Endangered and Sensitive Species if any: <br />Special Considerations: <br /> <br />QUESTIONS: <br />Would CWCB instream flows meet USFS needs? If not, why not?: <br />Yes, CWCB will meet USFS needs. Subordination agreement protects existing absolute <br />and conditional water rights. <br /> <br />If water is developed from stream, what protections does the USFS know would have to <br />be provided? None. <br /> <br />Is potential development compatiable with USFS needs? If not, why not? <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATIONS: <br />(i.e. can QP's be moved, CWCB instream flows acceptable, etc) <br />QP isfine in present location. Use CWCB instreamfiow of2 cfs year round. <br /> <br />ATTACHMENTS: List of attendees at the August 21, 1996 meeting and stream maps and lists <br />of water rights in area provided by the SEO. <br /> <br />RANDYlC:\MSOFFICEI WINWORDID2FSRWRFOR <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />.1:?:~ <br />