My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07997
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:29:43 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:42:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.L
Description
UCRBRIP Newsletters/Brochures
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
6/1/1994
Author
UCRBRIP
Title
Recovery Program Newsletter Summer 1994
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />- . DAM OPERATIONS KEY TO FISH RECOVERY <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />. . . . . .. Photo by Connie Young <br />Changing operation of federal dams,. such as. Flaming Gorge on northern <br />Utah's Green River, is one of the keys to reroveririg endangered fish, experts. <br />say. BiologistS believe the fish need flows similar to those that existed his- <br />toriCally, namely high spring flows and low, stable flows therest.of the year. <br /> <br />Director's message <br /> <br />By John Hamill ' <br />Recovery Program Director <br />u.s. Fish arid Wildl~e 'Service <br /> <br />Rerovery Action plan roinpleted <br />In 1993, the Recovery. Program <br />developed and adopted the Recovery <br />Implementation Program Reco'very' <br />Action Plan <br />(RIPRAP), which <br />. identifies. feasible <br />. actions .needed to <br />recover endangered <br />fish in the upper <br />Co lorado . River <br />Basin. The plan <br />gives highest priori- <br />ty to actions ,that <br />protect or improve <br />John Hamill habitat conditions <br />for the . fish and <br />resuit in mor.e immediate, positive pop- <br />ulation response. This includes activi- <br />ties. such as fish passage. construction, <br />restoration of flooded bottom land <br />'habitats, changes in reservoir opera- <br />tions, in-stream .flow protection, con- <br />trol of non-native fish and experimental <br />stocking of endangered fish. <br />An estimated $86 million will be <br />needed over tbe next six. years to <br />implement the recovery action plan. <br />Obtaining these funds will be a major <br />. challenge and priority for the <br />Recovery Program. To date, the pro- <br /> <br /> <br />gram has relied heavily on Bureau of <br />Reclamation funds to implement the <br />recovery action plan. Program partici: <br />pants are curnintly evaluating addi- . <br />tional funding strategies and cost-shar- <br />ing proposals. <br /> <br />In-stream flows targeted <br />The Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board has set an aggressive schedule <br />to appropriate in-stream flow rights for <br />. endangered fish in the Colorado, <br />Gunnison and Yampa rivers. In' March <br />the Board adopted a new policy for <br />appropriatIng these in-stream. flow <br />. rights, which is expected to reduce <br />conflict over flow recommendations <br />for endangered fish and the state's <br />'ability to develop the compact entitle- <br />ment. This policy will make the maxi- <br />mum amount of water available to the <br />fish at an early priority date. . <br />Also, last fall the Board signed an <br />enforcement agreement that allows the <br />Fish and Wildl ife Service to enforce in- <br />stream flows acquired or appropriated <br />under Colorado state law for endan- <br />gered fish. <br /> <br />Public InpUt to be ronsidered <br />Implementation of the recovery <br />action plan has stirred considerable <br />interest .and controversy among some <br />upper Colorado River Basin residents. <br />Concerns exist about program cost, <br />local impacts of recovery actions, lack <br />of public involvement in decision-mak- <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />ing and tlie value of endangered fish. <br />Program participants have respond- <br />ed with an expanded public outreach <br />and involvement effort. Public'meet- <br />ings have. been held 'in several <br />Colorado and Utah locations to discuss <br />topics such as restrictions on stocking <br />of warmwater sport' fish, changing <br />operations of federal'dams to provide <br />flows for endangered fish, construc- <br />tion of fish ladders and establishment <br />ofbypass flow requirements: <br />These meetings have helped identi- <br />fy ways to implement recovery actions <br />. while minimizing impacts on. local <br />'economies' and. other resourc'e uses.' <br />Information gathered' at these meeting <br />. also will be useful in determining <br />issues to address during the National <br />. Environmental Policy Act compliance <br />process. <br /> <br />Spawning site disrovered? <br />Researchers recently discovered <br />suspected Colorado squaw fish spawn- <br />ing activity in the Colorado River near <br />Grand ,Junction, Colo. Biologists <br />caught 18 sqtiawfish in reproductive <br />condition and discovered another sus- <br />pected spawning congregation on a <br />cobble bar near the plunge'pool below <br />Redlands Dam on the Gunnison River. <br />Although researchers previously <br />hypothesized that Colorado squaw fish <br />spawn in nwnerous areas in the upper <br />Colorado River, this is the first year <br />they found such good evidence. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.