Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />with the initial appropriation, the Bureau of Reclamation <br />began extensive subsurface investigations at the Narrows site. As a <br />result of the criticism of the geologic conditions, a board of consultants <br />was constituted to appraise the suitability of the damsite. The board <br />concluded that a safe dam could be constructed at the proposed site. <br /> <br />The state of Colorado also retained the services of Rov~A J. <br />TiptQn and Associates, an engineering firm with internationaf standing, <br />to conduct an independent investigation pertaining to the most suitable <br />reservoir site. That firm subsequently recommended that the reservoir be <br />constructed at the Narrows site. However, no local water conservancy <br />district was organized to sponsor and operate the proposed project. <br />Because of lack of support from local agencies, the state of Colorado <br />withheld its approval of the project and activities were suspended. <br /> <br />In 1958, a group of residents from the South Platte River <br />Valley, representing areas extending generally from just below Denver to <br />the state line, appeared before the Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />and requested the board to reinitiate studies leading towards the con- <br />struction of channel storage on the South Platte River. The board agreed <br />to this request and provided funds in subsequent years to the extent of <br />about $200,000 for further studies of channel storage on the river. <br />Congress also provided funds to the Bureau of Reclamation for a reanaly- <br />sis of the project. <br /> <br />The project reanalysis focused upon two potential reservoir <br />sites, one being the original Narrows site and the other being a site <br />some distance upstream in Weld County. The Colorado Water Conservation <br />Board~ployed two independent consultinq'firms to evaluate the compara- <br />t~ve land costs of the two sites and to evaluate the com~arative aeoloaic <br />con~itions and the resulting construction costs. The state water board <br />also appointed a steering committee consisting of citizen representatives <br />from the South Platte Valley to assist in the project evaluation. During <br />this same period a petition was circulated among the residents of the <br />Lower South Platte Valley requesting the organization of a water conser- <br />vancy district in accordance with the laws of the state of Colorado. <br />That petition, with the requisite number of signatures, was subsequently <br />presented to the District Court. In 1964, the Lower South Platte Water <br />Conservancy District was officially created by court order. <br /> <br />By the late summer of 1964, all facets of the project had been <br />explored to the point where it was again submitted to the Colorado Water <br />Conservation Board for policy decision. At a public meeting held in <br />Fort Morgan on September 12, 1964, the board reached and approved the <br />following conclusions: <br /> <br />1. That further site selection investigations would be <br />fruitless. <br /> <br />-3- <br />