My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07982
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:29:40 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:42:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8021
Description
Section D General Correspondence - Western States Water Council
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
1/8/1993
Author
Western States Water
Title
Western States Water 1993 - Issues 973-1024
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Or:. 41' ~.q" <br />d lJ !,) <br /> <br />July 2, 1993 <br />Issue No. 998 <br /> <br />WESTERN <br />STATES WATER <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />TIIE WEEKLY NEWSLETfER OF THE WESTERN STATES WATER COUNCIL <br /> <br />Creekview Plaza, Suite A-201/942 East 7145 Soot Midvale, Utah 84047 / (801) 561-5300 / FAX (801) 255-%42 <br /> <br />editor - Tony Willardson <br />typist - Carrie Curvin <br /> <br />WATER QUAUTY <br /> <br />EPA-Appropriations <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The House passed its Veterans' Affairs, Housing <br />and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies' <br />FY94 Appropriations Bill (H.R. 2491) on June 29. No <br />bill has been passed by the Senate. In H.R. 2491, <br />EPA's total appropriation is $6.68, down $259M from <br />current spending levels but up $269M from President <br />Clinton's budget proposal. EPA's operating budget is <br />$2.64B of the $6.6B total, which is about the same as <br />FY93. The water quality portion of the appropriation is <br />$2.488, down $73M from current spending levels. The <br />water quality funding will be spread between a wider <br />variety of projects than under the current program. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The water quality spending under H.R. 2491 breaks <br />down as follows: (1) $1.218B for the state revolving <br />loan fund (SRF) for sewage and water treatment <br />plants; (2) $599M for a proposed SRF for drinking <br />water projects; (3) $500M for grants to hardship <br />communities; (4) $100M for projects under Clean <br />Water Act (CWA) Section 319 to control rainwater <br />runoff pollution; (5) $25M for Section 104 (b)(3) water <br />quality agreements; and (6) $35M for wastewater <br />treatment in San Diego. Only a small portion of the <br />SRF funding 'lost' with the defeat of the President's <br />original stimulus package (WSW #992) was restored <br />in the streamlined stimulus package (as this newsletter <br />went to press, sources differed concerning whether <br />$35M or $70M was restored). The $500M for hardship <br />communities is for construction of wastewater <br />treatment facilities which are authorized before April, <br />1994. If the money is not spent by then, it reverts to <br />the SRF. Essentially, this means that a total of some <br />$1.8B would be appropriated for wastewater <br />construction in FY94, which is down from the <br />approximate $1.9B appropriated in FY93. <br /> <br />chairman - Dave Kennedy <br />executive director - Craig Bell <br /> <br />WATER RESOURCES <br /> <br />Publications <br /> <br />The Environment and Energy Study Institute (EESI) <br />has recently published two reports relating to western <br />water management. One is entitled 'New Policy <br />Directions to Sustain the Nation's Water Resources.' <br />According to EESI, it is based on a series of <br />Congressional briefings 'focused on the need for a <br />holistic water policy which takes into account the <br />interconnections between groundwater and sur1ace <br />waters and the interrelationships between water use, <br />water quality and related concerns. The briefings did <br />not advocate enactment of an omnibus federal water <br />law or creation of a super federal water agency or <br />establishment of a top-down federal water policy. <br />Instead, the series explored a number of policy <br />options to maximize the effectiveness of existing laws <br />and programs at all levels of government....' Among <br />the issues the report discusses are pollution <br />prevention, nonpoint sources of contamination, and <br />watershed approaches to water management and <br />protection. <br /> <br />The second report, 'EPA's Role in Water Use <br />Efficiency in the Western States,' was prepared for <br />EESI by Bruce Driver, a water lawyer and consu~ant. <br />It summarizes findings from interviews and discussions <br />with 60 representatives of western states, local <br />governments and interest groups. EESI notes, <br />'Competitive pressures on U.S. water resources are <br />growing.... Increasing the efficiency of water use and <br />management is often seen as a cost-effective means <br />to help meet all of these needs. Water use efficiency <br />also can contribute to the attainment of water quality <br />objectives; reduce water supply and wastewater <br />treatment costs; and reduce energy use associated <br />, with the pumping, treatment and heating of water.' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.