<br />protection.' The work of a 21 -member Bay-Delta
<br />Oversight Council to negotiate a long-term set of rules
<br />for Bay Delta water deliveries is expected to begin
<br />soon.
<br />
<br />WATER RESOURCES
<br />
<br />Water Exports/Alaska
<br />
<br />The State of Alaska has now released a discussion
<br />paper on water exports and sales ryvSW #966)
<br />prepared by Ric Davidge, State Division of Water
<br />Director. Accompanying the paper are draft
<br />regulations to implement a new water conservation
<br />fee for any water removed from a hydrologic unit
<br />within the state. The intent is to offset public costs of
<br />water exports. The discussion paper asserts that: (1)
<br />marine transport of water to Mexico or California is
<br />possible before 1995; (2) the economic benefits of
<br />such transfers could be significant; and (3)
<br />cooperative work between interested parties could
<br />make water exports a reality. Concepts evaluated
<br />include the market for water, water sources, delivery
<br />systems, resource development economics,
<br />transportation and marketing, environmental and
<br />social impacts, other limitations, and strategies for
<br />development. For copies call (907) 762-2294.
<br />
<br />In looking at water markets in the Southwest, the
<br />report finds the average cost of delivered water to
<br />California coastal communities from the state water
<br />project is about $500 per acre-foot (ac/ft). The
<br />average cost of reclaimed wastewater in California is
<br />between $700-$1400 per ac/ft. The cost of
<br />connecting Santa Barbara to the state water system
<br />and delivering water was estimated at $1200-$5400
<br />per ac/ft. Santa Barbara recently completed a
<br />desalination plant to treat emergency water supplies
<br />at $1,965-$1,312 per ac/ft. Outside of California,
<br />municipal purchases in Colorado of agricultural water
<br />cost about $1,400-$1,500 per ac/ft, while water rights
<br />in Reno, Nevada, for new subdivisions are valued at
<br />$2,000-$2,500 per ac/ft. To be competitive, Alaska
<br />officials believe they need to deliver water for less
<br />than $1,500 per ac/ft. Sunbelt Water, Inc., has
<br />offered Baja officials in northern Mexico a ten year
<br />contract to deliver water for less than $1,500 per ac/ft.
<br />
<br />Alaska has also completed a strategic plan for
<br />developing water and other natural resources, while
<br />conserving Alaska's wild, scenic and cultural values.
<br />
<br />The Division of Water is preparing tactical plans to
<br />implement the strategy, and identifying potential .
<br />regulatory problems and solutions. For example, the
<br />Division of Water is negotiating a memorandum of
<br />agreement with the U.S. Forest Service to inventory
<br />and characterize potential water sources for export
<br />from southeastern Alaska.
<br />
<br />WATER RESOURCES/WATER RIGHTS
<br />
<br />Colorado River!lndian Reserved Water Rights
<br />
<br />In a presentation to the Colorado River Water
<br />Users Association in December entitled 'Tribal Leasing
<br />of Colorado River Waters: Federal Policies and
<br />Regional Realities' author Daniel H. Israel asserted,
<br />'had there been no 1922 [Colorado River] Compact,
<br />Upper Basin marketing might be the law of the river.'
<br />He went on to say, 'water leasing by Colorado River
<br />[Indian] tribes advances new federal policies and
<br />current regional realities.' The assumption underlying
<br />these thoughts was that the 1922 Compact plan was
<br />to equitably develop the waters of each basin, but
<br />that while Lower Basin federal policies have secured
<br />full 1922 Compact depletions, Upper Basin federal
<br />policies have maximized Colorado River preservation,
<br />not development. The presentation explained the
<br />meaning of the phrase in the 1992 compact that .
<br />nothing in it would affect the obligations of the United
<br />States to Indian tribes as 'the United States has a
<br />trustee obligation to assist the tribes to fully develop
<br />their resources.' The author concluded, 'Interstate
<br />water marketing represents...an important economic
<br />opportunity. If properly structured, such transactions
<br />can restore the promise and commitments giving rise
<br />to the 1922 Colorado River Compact - namely, that
<br />each basin in the federal government pledge to
<br />secure the eauitable development of the waters of the
<br />Colorado River.' Mr. Israel may be reached at (303)
<br />939-8180.
<br />
<br />PEOPLE
<br />
<br />The National Water Resources Association Board
<br />of Directors has elected Ivan W. Flint as President for
<br />1993-94. WSWC member Fred N. Pfeiffer, San
<br />Antonio River Authority General Manager, was elected
<br />Vice-President. WSWC member Wayne P.
<br />Cunningham, Agricuitural Policy Analyst for the New
<br />Mexico Department of Agriculture, was re-elected
<br />treasurer.
<br />
<br />The WESTERN STATES WATER COUNCIL is an organization of representatives appointed by the Governors .
<br />of member states - Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, North
<br />Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming, and associate member state Oklahoma
<br />
|