Laserfiche WebLink
<br />April 16, 1993 <br /> <br />ISS~~~~\~~",,~> ,','. <br />r? "cl.... <br /> <br />~~~\.' 'Ci!I'(;;jb ..,. >~! <br />/. /,., <br />, /-: <br />C/ l' \\Y;' <br /> <br />THE WEEKLY NEWSLETfER OF THE WESTERN STATES WATER COUNCIL <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />001iJ03 <br /> <br />WESTERN <br />~STATES WATER <br /> <br />Creekview Plaza, Suite A-201/942 East 7145 So. 1 Midvale, Utah 84047/ (801) 561-5300 1 FAX (801) 255-%42 <br /> <br />editor - Tony Willardson <br />typist - Carrie Curvin <br /> <br />ENVlRONMENTIWATER QUAUTY <br /> <br />Texas <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Texas Governor Ann Richards has announced a <br />series of public recognition environmental awards. <br />Winners, which were selected by a committee from <br />over 900 entries, included the EI Paso Retired Seniors <br />Volunteer Program (RSVP), a national pilot for <br />wellhead protection, RSVP conducted door-to-door <br />interviews and reviewed local tax records to identify <br />138 private drinking water wells in EI Paso, together <br />with 2000 potential pollution sources. This ground <br />water protection program has been used as a model <br />by many other states and communities. A high school <br />parent volunteer was recognized as an individual <br />award winner for designing 'Classroom on the Creek.' <br />An EPA grant was used to stage a workshop for 25 <br />teachers and 1 00 students from throughout the Little <br />River Watershed and to underwrite a water quality <br />testing program involving 60 students. Planning is <br />underway for an event that could include dozens of <br />schools in a day of water quality monitoring. The <br />Governor also honored several cities and industries <br />that met criteria to attain, respectively, the <br />designations 'Clean Cities 2000' and 'Clean Industries <br />2000.' ' <br /> <br />UTlGATlON~NERGY <br /> <br />Washinaton v. Public Utilitv Dist. No. 1 of Jefferson <br />Countv/FederaI Power Act <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The Washington Supreme Court has affirmed a <br />state district court opinion holding that the Federal <br />Power Act (FPA) does not preempt the Washington <br />Department of Ecology from including minimum <br />streamflow conditions in a Clean Water Act (CWA) <br />Section 401 certilicate issued by the state in <br /> <br />. chairman~ Dave Kennedy <br />executive director - Craig Bell <br /> <br />conjunction with a hydropower project licensed by the <br />Federal Energy Regulatpry Commisllion (FERC), State <br />of Washinaton v. PublicUtilitv Dist. No; 1 of Jefferson <br />County. No. 58272'6 (Apr. 1, 1993). The City of <br />Tacoma and the Jefferson County Public Utility Disirict <br />No. 1 planned to build' ahydrQelectric facility on the <br />Dosewallips River. The applicants were required to <br />obtain a certilicate from the Washington Department of <br />Ecology under CWA Section 401 before beginning <br />construction. Such a certificate sets forth <br />'effluent...and other limitations...necessary to assure <br />that the applicant...will comply with any applicable <br />effluent...or other limitalions,...standard of <br />per1ormance,...or prohibition, effluent standard, or <br />pretreatment standard..., and with any other <br />appropri<;tte ,requirement of state law....' Ecology <br />granted the certificate,' 'but. conditioned it upon <br />maintenance of a minimum streamflow in an affected <br />portion of the river to benefit the Dosewallips fishery. <br />The applicants argued that federal law preempted <br />Ecology from establishing the streamflow requirement, <br />and that in any event Ecology was outside its authority <br />because its suggested streamflow was calculated to <br />enhance, rather than simply preserve, the fishery. <br /> <br />The court found that the CWA authorized Ecology <br />to include baseflow requirements in the Section 401 <br />certilicate to ensure compliance with Washington'S <br />water quality standards. The applicant argued that the <br />standards, and therefore the scope of the Section 401 <br />certificate, should be limited to control of pollution <br />discharges, and could not include streamflow levels. <br />Ecology maintained that the Section 401 certification <br />was an appropriate method of carrying out a provision <br />of state law which provides that 'perennial rivers and <br />streams...shall be retained with baseflow necessary to <br />provide for preservation of wildlife, fish, scenic, <br />aesthetic, and other environmental values and <br />navigational values.' The court agreed that the <br />