My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07975
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07975
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:29:38 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:42:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8278.100
Description
Title I - Yuma Desalting Plant
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
10/1/1987
Author
USDOI/BOR
Title
Yuma Desalting Plant Operations Study - Draft Special Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />required; and determination of impacts upon required YDP <br />capacity, operational requirements, and reject stream replacement <br />requirements. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Plans have been assigned to one of five categories. Assignment <br />to categories is based on cost, TVS, and anticipated severity of <br />institutional problems. The categories are as follows: <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Cateaorv I - <br />procedures. <br />staff during <br /> <br />Plans that involve modification to YDP or operating <br />These plans would be examined by Yuma project Office <br />the normal process of reducing in-house costs. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Cateaorv II - Plans that are highly cost effective and appear to <br />have no unresolvable political or institutional problems. These <br />plans warrant further consideration. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Cateaorv III - plans that are marginally cost effective and <br />appear to have no unresolvable political or institutional <br />problems. These plans would only be considered further if all <br />Category I and II plans were found to be unworkable. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Cateaorv IV - Plans that are cost effective but appear to have <br />unresolvable political or institutional problems. These plans <br />would be not considered in the future unless the political or <br />institutional climate changes. Plans dropped from consideration <br />early in the study are also included in this category. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Cateaorv V - Plans that are not cost effective and do not warrant <br />further consideration. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />In this analysis, plans considered economically infeasible are <br />those plans with annual costs greater than currently projected <br />annual costs of operating the YDP. Because the cost estimates <br />are imprecise, the cutoff for cost was assumed to be the annual <br />operating cost of the YDP plus 10 percent. Plans considered <br />technically infeasible and/or politically or institutionally <br />unacceptable were also eliminated from further consideration. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />DETERMINATION OF YIELDS <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Yield estimates were required for those proposed plans that would <br />provide substitute water before impacts upon the YDP operation <br />could be evaluated. Yield estimates were prepared from data <br />available in existing reports and studies. In a few cases, <br />estimates are based on experience rather than available data. <br />Even though many of the estimates. lack refinement, the estimates <br />are considered adequate for this first level of study. <br />Additional detail will be required for those plans proposed for <br />further study. Estimated yields have been noted in the detailed <br />descriptions of the individual plans. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.