My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07971
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07971
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:29:37 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:42:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40.A
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
11/16/1922
Author
Co. R Compact Comm.
Title
Minutes of Colorado Compact Commission - Meeting #18
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~rn, NORVIEL, Yes, and I rathor think that former yoars, if <br /> <br />they had been measured, would have shownporhaps a worse condition, <br /> <br />so I can't think that that is a fair division over a ten yoar <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />poriod,nor 'one' which gives the fullost protootion. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />11R. HOOVBR, In our discussions yostorday wo got away from <br /> <br />tho point of view of a fifty-fifty division of tho watcr. Wc set <br /> <br />up an entirely new hypothesis. That was' that wo mako, in offect, <br />, ' ' <br /> <br />a proliminary division pending the rovision of this compact. Tho <br /> <br />sevon and a half million annual flow of rights are croditod to tho <br /> <br />South, and"sovon and a half million will,be creditod to the North, <br /> <br />and at somo future day a revision of tho'distribution of the <br /> <br />remaining wator will be mado or dotermincd. <br /> <br />J~ increasing amount of water to one division will carry <br /> <br />automatically an incrcasc in tho rights ,of the othor basin and, <br /> <br /> <br />theroforc it soemed to 'me that WQ had me't tho situation. This <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />is a diffcrerit conception from the fifty-fifty division wo wore <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />considering in our prior discussions. <br /> <br />~1R. NORVIE1, If this includes roconstruction of the river, <br /> <br />then, I concede it is a more nearly fait basis. But if it docs <br /> <br />not,- if it is a division of the wator to be moasurcd at the point <br /> <br />of domarkation, I still insist that it is not quitc fair, bocause <br /> <br />'., ' <br />it is simply dividing what remains in tho rivcr. <br /> <br />I!R. HOOVER: We arc leaving thc whOle remaining flow of tho. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />basin for future detormination. <br /> <br />:.' <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />1m. NORVIE1, Vlliat I am getting a,t is this: That tho upper <br />,," <br /> <br />basin takos out and uses a ccrtain amount of water, a,nd then, as <br /> <br />18th-S.F. <br />32 <br /> <br />145 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.