Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1ill. SCRUGIL~l: I movo tho paragraph be adoptod as just road. <br /> <br />(Theroupon, tho motion of ),lr. Scrugham, having boon <br /> <br />duly secondod nnd put to ~ voto, tho camo was unani- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />mously paosod.) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Lill. HOOVDR, At this timo I would liko to raiso a point <br /> <br />which III'. Norviol brought out last ovoning rogarding tho inclu- <br /> <br />sion of anuthor paragraph to tho offoct that all prosont rights <br /> <br />to bGnoficial use in ~griculturo, industrial procosses and <br /> <br />domostic purposos aro horoby confirmod. Tho valuo of suoh a <br /> <br />provision is purolypsychological bocause if thoy arc rights, <br /> <br />thoy aro rights, and thoy oxist, and thoy OlI'O fixod now. On <br /> <br />thoothcr hand, tho quostion always comes up in tho mind of ovory <br /> <br />possossor of such right as to .whethor this pact intorfores with <br /> <br />him, and wo could allay any such quostions by inclusion in tho <br /> <br />compact of somo such provision. <br /> <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />rill. SCRUGH,Ul, In' conformity with the laws of the states in <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />which thoy aro locatod. That is tho undorstanding. <br /> <br />till. HOOVER, If thoy aro rights, they must conform to tho <br /> <br />stato laws. <br /> <br />1m. SCRUGIIAL!, It would, bo variablo of courso. rfhat would <br /> <br />bo claimod undor riparian rights in California would not apply <br /> <br />furthor up <> Hov! about that lII" 0 IJcKisick? California I'ocognizos <br /> <br />riparian rights, tho othor statos 'do not. Is thoro any diffi- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />culty which would be brought up through such a wording as em- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />bodiod in this paragraph? ria tor appropriation in tho othcr statos <br /> <br />is based upon tho doctrino of appropriation.. <br /> <br />140 <br /> <br />18th-S"F" <br />27 <br />