Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Preliminary <br />Alternative No. <br /> <br />Major Features <br /> <br />Grey Mountain Reservoir <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />Grey Mountain Reservoir-Idylwilde Reservoir <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />Grey Mountain Reservoir-Elkhorn Reservoir <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />New Seaman Reservoir-Indian Meadows Reservoir- <br />Rockwell Reservoir <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />New Seaman Reservoir-Indian Meadows Reservoir- <br />Rockwell Reservoir <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />Grey Mountain ~eservoir-Indian Meadows Reservoir- <br />Rockwell Reservpir-upper Poudre Reservoir <br /> <br />Comments received from <br />at public meetings held to <br />alternatives which would <br />development in the canyon. <br /> <br />the study advi~ory committee and from the public, <br />explain the study, resulted in the addition of two <br />have a lesser degree of impact on existing <br />These two alternatives were: <br /> <br />Preliminary <br />Alternative No. <br /> <br />J.tajor Features <br />I <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />New Seaman Resarvoir-Elkhorn Reservoir <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />Elkhorn Reservoir <br /> <br />E. INALOATIQ!iI OF ALTERNATIVBS <br /> <br />Two sets of evaluation factors, monetary and non-monetary, were used in <br />evaluating the eight preliminary alternatives in Phase I of the study. The <br />monetary factors consisted of: (1) initi~l investment costs, (2) benefit-cost <br />ratios, (3) net direct economic benefits ~nd (4) cost effectiveness expressed <br />in terlns of project costs per kilowatt elf installed generation capacity and <br />costs per acre-foot of storage. The non-monetary factors used were: (1) <br />geologic conditions, (2) impacts from inundation at each reservoir site and <br />(3) increased water yield of "new water~ developed as a result of project <br />implementation. These evaluation factors 'were selected in accordance with the <br />study mandate which was to assess the englneering and economic feasibility of <br />. ' <br />a potent1al Cache la Poudre Project. <br /> <br />At the completion of Phase I, the CWCB selected Alternatives 1, 2, 7 and 8 <br />for further analysis in Phase II of the study. The four selected alternatives <br />represent two important development concepts. Alternatives 1 and 8 represent <br />single reservoir systems which provide storage primarily for conservation <br />purposes (agricultural, municipal and :industrial water demands and the <br />improved management of existing water 'supplies). Alternatives 2 and 7 <br /> <br />S-4: <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />