Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'Y J. WaIte: :::. ~I~ C?~RACTERrSTrcs <br />).. C.~dral <br />CAacAde and portland Creeks drain the rugged volcanic and glaciated <br />d "nt of th~ town of Ouray. The boundaries of the basins are pre- <br />.i~G:.h4 a eg~ ~ <br />D.~:.d in Figure 3.1. Elevations range from 7,685 feet at thee mouth of the <br /><r..~. Yhich empty into the Uncompahgre River to the headwaters of the cirques <br />At 1~.eOO feet. The creeks convey runoff from rainfall and snowmelt and also <br />c~~~.lize debris flows and avalanches. The debris flow hazards within these <br />twv watersheds are closely related to the pattern of glacial deposition and <br />Dcaur and postglacial landsliding of thick glacial material and erodible <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />;ds, <br />I, BOlllder <br />, <br /> <br />s. thesis <br /> <br />I.S. <br /> <br />The <br /> <br />flood. <br /> <br />and <br /> <br />20, <br /> <br />s. <br /> <br />~'I'1 <br /> <br />000900 <br /> <br />3.1 <br /> <br />'I'Olunics. <br />The headwaters of Cascade and Portland Creek watersheds both drain the <br />~ertlary San Juan volcanic formation. These rocks are locally faulted and <br />!rActured and composed of tuff, breccia, andesitic and rhyodacitic flow, <br />revorked bedded volcanic conglomerates and sandstone. The steeply sloping <br />creeks then flow west and drain onto the Uncompahgre flood plain forming large <br />debris fans upon which the town of Ouray resides. <br />Other than these similarities, the two watershed and associated debris <br />flow paths exhibit .contrasting characteristics. First, Portland Creek drains <br />the kophitheater which is approximately twice as large an area as the Cascade <br />watershed. Portland Creek drains an area of 2.8 square miles while Cascade <br />Creek drains an area of 1.3 square miles. The Portland Creek basin's shape is <br />oore nearly circular as compared to Cascade's long, narrow shape. Much of the <br />upper watershed and sediment source of the Amphitheater is more steeply <br />sloping. The Portland watershed slopes at 30 to 100\ compared to Cascade <br />Creek at 30 to 70\. A graph of the two channel profiles is provided in Figure <br />3.2. As seen from the graph, the upper reach of Portland is much steeper than <br />Cascade. As indicated on the attached map (Figure 3.1), the geologic hazard <br />of this area is mapped as "rockfall" compared to parts of the Cascade head- <br />waters where "talus slopes" are mapped on the less steep slopes. Although not <br />shown on this map, another critical difference is that a majority of the <br />Portland watershed below about 9,600 feet is overlain by thick accumulations <br />of glacial drift and colluvium. This material is mapped as "cst," colluvial <br />slopes with a thickness greater than 6 feet. Within Portland Creek itself, <br />the colluvial slope and glacial drift material is relatively thick, e.g., a <br />" maximum of about 20 feet thick at point A and 10 feet thick at point B (Figure <br />3.1) . <br /> <br />.t.~..?~l::"-''''"",~"", '.'~""~">':,~_~___.~'r...~. ~.. ~"""~_ <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />"-.......----- <br />