Laserfiche WebLink
<br />3D1.J5'j <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, l <br /> <br />PRELIMINARY <br />ASPINALL UNIT ACCOUNTING ISSUES <br />APRIL 23,1996 <br /> <br />Back in January, 1992 Reclamation and the National Park Service (NPS) entered into discussions <br />with the state of Colorado concerning the development of a water service contract for the NPS <br />which would help address issues associated with the federal reserved water right quantification <br />for the Black Canyon of the Gwrnison National Monument. Accordingly, the NEPA process for <br />this contract was initiated and a "Scoping Report for the Gwmison River Contract" issued in <br />March 1993, In addition, since 1992, Reclamation and the NPS have used an example contract <br />accounting process on strictly a trial basis during the Aspinall Unit operations meetings held in <br />January, April and late August of each year, A number of questions have arisen concerning the <br />accounting process. The purpose of this issue paper is identifY the outstanding issues affecting <br />the accounting, The parties will use this issue paper to assist in the development of a detailed <br />accounting form. Once a detailed accounting form is agreed upon, the parties will then hold <br />additional negotiating sessions to modifY the proposed contract as necessary. <br /> <br />.-t <br />, 1 <br />~ <br /> <br />The state of Colorado remains willing to discuss the accounting issues and work towards there <br />resolution. However, we have spent numerous hours working on this contract and related issues <br />already and are of the opinion that not a great deal of progress can be made until the needs of the <br />federal reserved water right and the endangered fish are clearly identified. It was apparent in the <br />scoping meetings that Gwmison Basin interests are not going to buy into any contract or <br />accounting procedure until the quantities of water required by the Monument and the endangered <br />fish are firmly identified and justified. One of the most constructive things the NPS could do <br />from Colorado's standpoint is to identifY the amounts of water it would seek in its quantification <br />case, Absent such information, or a well defined process for providing the information, the state <br />of Colorado will be reluctant to spend significant time working on accounting issues, Given that <br />a final biological opinion for Aspinall is not expected until May, 1998 there is no Urgent need to <br />complete an accounting, but work toward the resolution of as may of the potential accounting <br />issues as reasonably possible is worthwhile. <br /> <br />This issue paper briefly recounts the significant issues which the NPS contract accounting must <br />address, Please bear in mind this is the first attempt to recount the significant issues in almost <br />three years and thus it should be considered preliminary and subject to change. Also, as you are <br />aware, there are a number of related questions that surround each accounting issue identified <br />below. The Scoping Report and attached comment letters should be consulted for a more <br />complete discussion of the issues, Furthermore, it may not be necessary to incl ude each item <br />below in the accounting, but the accounting narrative should clearly show that each item was <br />considered and indicate how it was treated. The accounting parameters, issues and questions are <br />as follows: <br /> <br />.J <br />