Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CHAPTER FOUR <br /> <br />adjacent to popularly used recreation resources would <br />reduce scenic viewing related recreation experiences <br />and visitor use as a result of lowered scenic quality. <br /> <br />Domestic sheep grazing near and above timberline <br />would alter recreation settings and experiences <br />particularly for backcountry visitors, especially in the <br />Silver Creek drainage. <br /> <br />Impacts from Forest ManagemenL Timber harvests <br />occurring in a variety of ROS settings would result in <br />a loss and lowering of recreation experiences, ROS <br />settings, scenic quality, and watchable wildlife <br />opportunities. Visitor use in these areas would <br />gradually decrease over the long-term. <br /> <br />Impacts from Visual Resource ManagemenL <br />Managing approximately 90% of the planning area <br />under VRM Class IV guidelines would permit <br />extensive changes to occur within the landscapes in <br />the planning area, resulting in lowered scenic quality <br />which, in turn, would result in diminished recreation <br />experiences and altered ROS settings. <br /> <br />Impacts from Historical Resource Management. The <br />identification, stabilization and interpretation of <br />historical resources would enhance the selling and <br />experience of recreation visitors by increasing <br />enjoyment and understanding. <br /> <br />Impacts from Transportation and Access. <br />Acquisition of public access would increase <br />recreational visitor use and would make available <br />more public lands for recreation activities such as <br />hunting, sightseeing and OHV use. <br /> <br />Impacts from Acquisition of Non-Federal Lands. <br />The acquisition of inholdings and lands with <br />significant recreation resources would expand <br />recreational opportunities and would eliminate <br />potential private development. <br /> <br />CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ON RECREATION <br /> <br />Improved recreation facilities, hunting and fishing <br />opportunities, and increased OHV use would be <br />offset by a drastic decrease in backcountry visitor use <br />and use by those seeking a more primitive experience. <br />The decrease in use would occur because of lowered <br />scenic quality, and thus viewable landscapes, altered <br /> <br />ROS settings, displacement of wildlife, and losses of <br />wildlife habitat and fisheries. <br /> <br />IMPACTS ON OUTSTANDINGLY <br />REMARKABLE SCENIC VALUES IN <br />SEGMENT A, LAKE FORK OF THE <br />GUNNISON RIVER STUDY CORRIDOR <br /> <br />IMPACTS FROM PROPOSED MANAGEMENT <br />ACTIONS <br /> <br />Impacts from the Recommendation. In this <br />alternative, the 13.3 mile Segment A of the Lake Fork <br />of the Gunnison River from Sloan Lake to Wager <br />Gulch would NOT BE RECOMMENDED as being <br />suitable for inclusion into the National Wild and <br />Scenic Rivers System (NWSRS). The resultant <br />potential and significant impacts to the outstandingly <br />remarkable scenic values (values) that qualify this <br />segment to be eligible for inclusion are discussed <br />below. <br /> <br />Impacts from Locatable Minerals ManagemenL If <br />mineral activity were to occur on federal mineral <br />estate, values would potentially be altered in the <br />short-term on an additional 330 acres of public land <br />in the "Loop Road" protective withdrawal, which <br />would be recommended for revocation in this <br />alternative. The total federal mineral estate would <br />thus be available for mineral entry and location, but <br />would be subject to BLM's surface management <br />regulations regarding reasonable reclamation and <br />plans of operation. <br /> <br />Impacts from Recreation ManagemenL Managing7.3 <br />miles of public land in Unit C-t (3,665 acres) in the <br />segment as open to motorized vehicular use would <br />result in significant deterioration of scenic values, as <br />a result of physical impacts to terrain from OHV use, <br />especially in the American Basin drainage. <br /> <br />Impacts from Visual Resource Management. <br />Managing about 7.3 miles (3,665 acres) of public land <br />in Unit C-t under VRM Class IV objectives could <br />potentially result in an increased amount of visual <br />change and contrast over that currently managed for <br />under VRM Class II objectives. <br /> <br />4-36 <br />