Laserfiche WebLink
<br />f\ " . ') c:.? <br />;, ~ I, _ , 0.... <br />.J ~ '-" "-'" <br /> <br />resulting in an annual loss of 7.5 MBP of commercial <br />timber per year being available for harvest. <br /> <br />Impacts from Wlldllre Habitat ManagemenL <br />Restrictions on timber harvests from May 1 to June 30 <br />in elk calving areas would shorten the usual six-month <br />harvest season by one-third. <br /> <br />Restricting harvest of ponderosa pine stands by 30% <br />for non-game habitat management would remove <br />1,000 acres from the timber base resulting in 30 MBP <br />of Ponderosa Pine per year being unavailable for <br />harvest. <br /> <br />Protective stipulations for goshawk neets, if present, <br />would result in suitable commercial forest lands being <br />unavailable for harvest. If an estimated 10 goshawk <br />nests are located, 1,260 acres would be removed from <br />the timber base resulting in 38 MBP per year being <br />unavailable for harvest. Protecting other raptor nest <br />sites would remove 500 acres from the timber base <br />resulting in 15 MBP per year being unavailable for <br />harvest. <br /> <br />Limiting road construction to 1.5 miles per square <br />mile to reduce stress on calving elk in unit B.12 would <br />preclude harvest on approximately 500 acres of <br />suitable commercial forest lands which would result in <br />20 MBP per year being unavailable for harvest. <br /> <br />Impaets from Livestock Grazing Management. <br />Livestock utilization and trampling of approximately <br />400 acres would continue on lands needing <br />reforestation, that is, on lands classified as poorly <br />stocked. <br /> <br />Impacts from Recreation Management. Increasing <br />recreational use on High Mesa would create a serious <br />safety hazard along the switchbacks on the High Mesa <br />Road because of logging trucks going downhill <br />meeting recreational vehicles going uphill. <br /> <br />Restrictions on timber harvests to enhance recreation <br />and ROS settings in units B.1 and B-2 would <br />eliminate harvest on 14,527 acres of commercial <br />timber, resulting in an annual harvest reduction of 435 <br />MBP. <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVE B IMPACTS <br /> <br />Impacts from Visual Resource ManagemenL <br />Managing the High Mesa area under VRM Class II <br />objectives would limit harvest methods to only <br />selective cuts. Opportunities to harvest bug-killed <br />areas or burned over areas would be eliminated. <br /> <br />Implementing commercial timber harvests to meet <br />VRM class II objectives in unit B-7 would remove <br />about 1,500 acres from the commercial timber base <br />resulting in 45 MBP being unavailable for harvest <br />annually. <br /> <br />Impacts from Disposal of Public Lands. A total of <br />153 acres of suitable commercial forest lands would <br />no longer be in public ownership. This would result <br />in 5 MBP per year being unavailable for harvest. <br /> <br />CUMULATIVE IMPACTS ON FOREST <br />MANAGEMENT <br /> <br />Restrictions on timber harvests would eliminate <br />sustained yield harvest on 19,670 acres of suitable <br />commercial forest lands resulting in 590 MBP per <br />year being unavailable for harvest. A total of 39,442 <br />acres of suitable commercial forest lands would be <br />managed for sustained yield production which would <br />result in an annual harvest of 1,180 MBP. An <br />additional 5,143 acres of suitable woodlands would be <br />available for harvest annually (24,405 acres total), <br />potentially increasing annual harvest by 105 cords, for <br />a total of 505 cords annually. Other forest products <br />would also be available for harvest (Christmas trees, <br />wildings, etc.). <br /> <br />IMPACTS ON RECREATION <br /> <br />IMPACTS FROM PROPOSED MANAGEMENT <br />ACTIONS <br /> <br />Impacts from Recreation Management. Additional <br />and improved campground facilities, improved hiking <br />trails, and increased visitor contacts would enhance <br />visitor use, enjoyment and understanding of resources <br />in the Planning Area. If a joint BLMlUSFS visitor <br />center is eventually constructed in Lake City, <br />recreation management effectiveness and general <br />public education and awareness of BLM management <br />would be greatly improved in the Planning Area, <br />especially in the south and west portions. <br /> <br />4-23 <br />