Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CHAPTER FOUR <br /> <br />Impacts from Uvestock Grazing Mnnagement. <br />Eliminating sheep grazing on 3,743 acres of <br />Uncompahgre fritillary butterfly habitat would <br />increase the production of snow willow, a very <br />important habitat requirement for the butterfly. <br /> <br />Impacts from Recreation Management. Limiting <br />OHV use to designated roads in the South Beaver <br />Creek ACEC would help to prevent the accidental <br />destruction of 4,492 acres of skiff milkvetch habitat. <br />This species usually occur in small dense groups <br />making them more susceptible to disturbance. <br /> <br />Limiting OHV use to designated routes within the <br />Uncompahgre fritillary butterfly babitat would prevent <br />accidental destruction of this species habitat on 3,743 <br />acres. <br /> <br />Impacts from Acquisition of Non-Federal Lands and <br />Disposal of Public Lands. Acquiring available non- <br />federal lands containing colonies of skiff milkvetch as <br />necessary would increase the populations on public <br />land by 35%. Not disposing of public lands <br />containing colonies of skiff milkvetch until inventories <br />show sufficient colonies exist on public lands in the <br />planning area would maintain populations of the <br />species on public lands. <br /> <br />CUMULATIVE IMPACTS SPECIAL STATUS <br />PLANT AND ANIMAL SPECIES AND HABITAT <br /> <br />Designation of two ACECs, limiting OHV use, and <br />eliminating domestic sheep grazing would increase our <br />knowledge about, and would prevent accidental <br />destruction of skiff milkvetch plants and habitat, and <br />habitat of the Uncompahgre fritillary butterfly. <br /> <br />IMPACTS ON TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE <br />HABITAT <br /> <br />IMPACTS FROM PROPOSED MANAGEMENT <br />ACTIONS <br /> <br />Impacts from Wildlife Habitat Management. Land <br />treatment projects, water developments and managing <br />elk and deer populations would increase wildlife <br />forage quality and availability to help meet CDOW <br />long-term elk and deer herd goals. Improvement of <br />habitat quality would improve big game distribution, <br /> <br />reduce stress on big game, and decrease forage <br />utilization levels. <br /> <br />Reducing the deer population within the highway <br />livestock grazing allotment, No. 6056, by 50% would <br />improve the quality of winter habitat. <br /> <br />Interseeding and land treatment projects in the <br />sagebrush vegetation type within pronghorn antelope <br />yearlong range would provide sufficient forage for an <br />additional 200 animals (500 total) yearlong to increase <br />the antelope population from 300 to 500 animals <br />yearlong. <br /> <br />Modifying existing allotment and pasture fences in <br />pronghorn antelope yearlong ranges would provide <br />access to additional pronghorn antelope habitat and <br />forage. <br /> <br />Impacts from Locatable Minerals Management. <br />Withdrawing 58,369 acres from mineral entry and <br />location would reduce the potential for habitat loss of <br />all wildlife species on these lands from mineral <br />development. <br /> <br />Road construction, surface disturbance, and increased <br />human activity that potentially would accompany <br />locatable mineral development would eliminate <br />habitat, alter use patterns, increase stress and disrupt <br />nesting and breeding seasons of a wide variety of <br />game and non-game species. The impact of mining <br />activities would be greatest where bighorn sheep <br />habitat, crucial elk and deer winter range and sage <br />grouse lek areas occur on lands with a high potential <br />for the occurrence of locatable minerals. <br /> <br />Impacts from Saleable Minerals Management. <br />Seasonal restrictions on authorizations for mineral <br />material disposal would protect sage grouse <br />broodrearing areas and big game crucial winter range <br />from disturbance during critical times of the year. <br /> <br />Not permitting mineral material disposal on sage <br />grouse strutting grounds would protect these areas <br />from surface disturbance associated with this activity. <br /> <br />Impacts from Soil and Water Resources <br />Management. Increasing ground cover in the <br />sagebrush vegetation type would improve hiding and <br />nesting cover for sage grouse and other non-game <br /> <br />4-18 <br />