Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> .-4 <br />" l(j <br />',' <br />;.~ ~ <br />C\J <br />\;,. 0 <br />Co <br /> <br />tlon and represents the configuration used In the Bechtel study for the <br />pul iverized coal-fired plant with rail-del ivered coal. <br /> <br />Comh I ned Makeup and S I destream lime/Soda Soften I ng <br /> <br />-;, <br /> <br />In this process option, both makeup and sldestream lime/soda softening are ap- <br />pi led to the circulating water system. Recycleable wastewaters are con- <br />centrated In vapor compression evaporators. Non-recyclable wastewaters and <br />sludges are discharged to evaporation ponds. High quality water from the was- <br />tewater evaporators Is used as condensate makeup. Softened water Is used to <br />supply the scrubber and ash systems. <br /> <br />,. <br />;, <br /> <br />The combined makeup/sidestream softening process provides partial makeup sof- <br />tening by using high pH effluent from the sldestream softener. Chemical costs <br />may be reduced, but capital costs are greater than makeup or sldestream sof- <br />tening alone. <br /> <br />-r <br /> <br />This option shows economic and technical promise for the sewage effluent op- <br />tion, but the scope of the study precluded In-depth analysis. The additional <br />system complexity, higher capital cost and lack of demonstrated commercial <br />operations were the main reasons for eliminating this configuration from fur- <br />ther consideration. <br /> <br />" <br />.. <br /> <br />Summary of Process Options for Economic Evaluation <br /> <br />The five process options selected from the screening process for economic <br />analysis are: <br /> <br />Option I-I V <br />Option II-LV <br />Option 111-1 V <br />Option IV-SE <br />~ <br />Option V-SE <br /> <br />Ix Softenlng/Sldestream Softenlng/VCE/Ponds <br /> <br />Sldestream Softenlng/VCE/Evaporatlon Ponds <br /> <br />Makeup Lime/Soda Softenlng/VCE/Evaporatlon Ponds <br /> <br />Makeup Lime/Soda Softenlng/VCE/Evaporatlon Ponds <br /> <br />Makeup Lime/Soda Softening/Recycle Softenlng/VCE/Evaporatlon <br />Ponds <br /> <br />The study addressed process options applicable to the Lower Virgin River Unit. <br />The two cases which used secondary effluent were done as a base case and a <br />special applications case. <br /> <br />WATER TREATMENT PROCESS DESIGN <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />Appraisal level process designs were developed for the five selected options <br />based on the Harry Allen power plant configuration. Process and material <br />balances and process flow diagrams were developed for each option. <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />The raw water supply system Is assumed to be the same for each option. <br />raw water supply system Includes polymer Injection into either the Las <br />secondary effluent or the Lower Virgin River water upstream of the raw <br /> <br />The <br />Vegas <br />water <br /> <br />4-13 <br /> <br />, <br />