Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I " <br />'.;~. <br />" <br /> <br />C", <br />'<':!" <br />"'1' <br />N <br />o <br />C' <br /> <br />"', <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />,:::.~ <br /> <br />,'~ <br /> <br />.~, <br /> <br /> <br /><{ <br /> <br />.,;.; <br /> <br />" <br />:'" <br />}" <br /> <br />;1< <br /> <br />, <br />,'. <br /> <br />):" <br /> <br />.c <br /> <br />'.~ <br /> <br />"~. <br /> <br />'" <br /> <br />.~~ <br /> <br />,,:; <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />~~ <br />, <br />',' <br /> <br />y~ <br /> <br />",'-, <br />/; <br /> <br />;* <br />i <br /> <br />references. For circulating water makeup treatment, the volume of waste <br />produced by RO precludes Its application. <br /> <br />Sldestream RO treatment is an emerging application which Is being applied at <br />the Bayswater Station In Australia. The Bayswater Station Is presently In <br />startup. Based on operating experiences on power plant wastewaters, the <br />sldestream application of RO should be technically viable, but has not yet <br />been commercially demonstrated. <br /> <br />The use of spiral wound RO as a wastewater concentration process has been <br />demonstrated at the R.D. Nixon Station In Colorado, the San Juan Station In <br />New Mexico, and the Martin Lake and Monticello Stations In Texas. The com- <br />bined experiences of these power plants have shown that RO Is a commercially <br />viable wastewater treatment process, provided proper design, operating and <br />maintenance approaches are appl led. Application of spiral wound RO to was- <br />tewater concentration was not considered economically feasible because of the <br />pretreatment and disposal costs associated with the Lower Virgin River Unit <br />water quality. <br /> <br />Seeded RO, using a calcium sulfate seed slurry process to prevent scaling, Is <br />an emerging technology with potential makeup water and wastewater applica- <br />tions. Seeded RO requires minimal pretreatment compared to conventional RO In <br />applications where calcium and silica reductions are required In the feed <br />water. Seeded RO has been demonstrated through laboratory tests In the U.S., <br />a pilot test at the Hunter Generating Station In Utah and through pilot tests <br />conducted In South Africa on mine wastewaters. <br /> <br />The laboratory and pilot tests showed that the seeded RO process Is techni- <br />cally viable, but that membrane life Is sensitive to specific wastewater <br />quality. Seeded RO was not selected for application In the water treatment <br />process designs because It has not been demonstrated on a commercial scale and <br />accurate capital and operating cost data Is not yet available. <br /> <br />Although reverse osmosis Is a commercially viable and economic process for the <br />production of high quality boiler makeup water, the chemistries of the Lower <br />Virgin unit and secondary sewage effluent In conjunction with the water <br />quality requirements of the generating plant make It uneconomical for these <br />applications. Reverse osmosis (as a waste treatment option) was therefore <br />rejected from further consideration. <br /> <br />Electrodialysis <br /> <br />Electrodialysis (ED) is similar to reverse osmosis In that semipermeable <br />membranes are used for removal of dissolved sol ids. The primary differences <br />I Ie In the characteristics of the membranes and the driving force. An ED sys- <br />tem contains a stack of alternately placed cation and anion permeable <br />membranes with spacers which allow flow paral lei to the membranes. A DC cur- <br />rent provides the motive force for the selective Ion migration through these <br />membranes. Modifications to the basic ED process Include Electrodialysis <br />Reversal (EDR) where the polarity of the DC current Is periodically reversed <br />automatically which provides for on-stream cleaning of the system and a reduc- <br />t i on I,n the fou I I ng potent I a I and lower c hem I ca I requ I rements. <br /> <br />4-5 <br />