|
<br />o
<br />c)
<br />I'~
<br />
<br />CO
<br />C)
<br />
<br />CHAPTER 8: FLOW RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE RECOVERY
<br />OF ENDANGERED FISH, . , , , . , , , , , . , , , . , , , , , , , , ' , , , , ' , , , , , , , , , , , , 8 - 1
<br />RECOMMENDED HYDROGRAPH CONDITIONS ,.""""""""""""" 8 - 2
<br />RECOMMENDED RESERVOIR OPERATING RULES, , , , , , , , , , , , , . , , , , , , , , , , , 8 - 6
<br />MODEL RESULTS""""".."" ,',' ,.",.""""""""""."" 8 -13
<br />Hydrologic Results , , , , , . . , , , , , , , , ' , , , , . . , . , , , , , ' , . , , ' , , , , , , , , , , ' 8 - 13
<br />Backwater Habitat Results , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 8 - 24
<br />Fish Recovery, Water Development, and Flow Recommendations ",."", 8 - 24
<br />
<br />REFERENCES """"""'" , , , . , , , , , , , . , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . ' . , , , ' , , , , , , , , , , " R - 1
<br />
<br />GLOSSARY """"""""""."""""""""""",.".'"".'"", G - 1
<br />
<br />LIST OF TABLES
<br />
<br />Table S,1.
<br />
<br />Table 2,1,
<br />
<br />Table 2,2,
<br />
<br />Table 2,3,
<br />
<br />Table 2.4,
<br />
<br />Table 2,S,
<br />
<br />Table 2,6,
<br />
<br />Table 2.7,
<br />
<br />Table 2,8,
<br />
<br />Table 4,1,
<br />
<br />Flow requirements needed to produce important biological responses
<br />and habitats in the San Juan River. """""""""""""""",, S - 4
<br />
<br />The major habitat types mapped in the San Juan River from color plates
<br />taken from airborne videography, """",.",.""".""""."", 2 - 7
<br />
<br />Reach definitions, variables considered. and their mean values
<br />within each reach used in defining geomorphically different reaches, """" 2 - 8
<br />
<br />I,
<br />
<br />Comparison of storm magnitude and frequency for the Colorado River
<br />at Cisco gage, Green River at Green River gage, and San Juan River
<br />
<br />near Bluff gage, ,.., , , , , , , , , , , , , , . , , , , , . , , . , , , , , , . , . . , , , , , , . , , , , 2 - 14
<br />
<br />Comparison of hydrograph statistics for pre-dam (1929 to 1961),
<br />post-dam (1962 to 1991), and study periodS (1992 to 1997)
<br />for the San Juan River near Bluff, Utah, , , . , , , , , . , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . . , . , , 2 - 16
<br />
<br />Eight general categories of habitat types on the San Juan River. """"" 2 - 22
<br />
<br />I
<br />I
<br />i
<br />I
<br />
<br />A comparison of habitat quality features in runs and riffles
<br />by geomorphic reach for 1995, 1996, and 1997 combined
<br />in the San Juan River, """'.,."""."'.'""""",,,,,.',,'. 2 - 27
<br />
<br />A riverwide comparison of habitat quality features for five sample periods
<br />in the San Juan River, "",.""'.",."".',.,'.'"""""",,, 2 - 27
<br />
<br />,
<br />,
<br />.,
<br />
<br />Habitat types as a percent of total wetted area (TWA)
<br />for the 1S-mile reach of the Colorado River at three flow levels. """"'" 2 - 29
<br />
<br />Summary of Navajo Dam release hydrograph characteristics
<br />during the research period, 1992 to 1997, , , , , . , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . , , , , , , , , , 4 - 1
<br />
<br />SJRIP Biology Committee
<br />4 December 1998
<br />
<br />T-3
<br />
<br />Table of Contents
<br />Draft Flow Report
<br />
<br />:1
<br />"
<br />II
<br />'I
<br />
|