My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07896
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07896
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:29:20 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:40:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8449.600
Description
Chatfield Reservoir
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Date
2/1/1976
Author
M W Bittinger & Asso
Title
Preliminary Feasiblity Estimate of the Potential Use of the Conservation Pool of Chatfield Reservoir
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />water under this contract or some alternate storage possibility will be <br />worked out between the two reservoirs. <br /> <br />The storage decrees held by Two Forks Reservoir will undoubtedly affect <br /> <br /> <br />the water-storage operation in Chatfield under the 1975 priority. The magni- <br /> <br /> <br />tude of this effect will largely depend upon the reservoir operation practices <br /> <br /> <br />which are unknolVll at the present. For the purposes of r~is analysis inflows <br /> <br /> <br />to Chatfield from Plum Creek alone were separately considered, these waters <br /> <br /> <br />not being physically available for the Two Forks decrees. <br /> <br />Limited by the availabili'ty of d~ta, the study extended over a period <br />of 26 years from 1948 through 1973. The estimated volumes that can be stored <br />under the 1975 priority at the Chatfield Dam annually shows a wide variation <br />--between 214,000 acre-feet and 0 acre-feet from the watershed including that <br />of Plum Creek with a median of 9,460 acre-feet. The storable volumes from <br />the Plum Creek wat rshed alone range between 68,000 acre-feet and' 0' annuaily, <br />with a median of 2,220 acre-feet. <br /> <br />During this analysis, it became obvious that the effect of the prolonged <br /> <br /> <br />drought period of the mid-50's distorts the results of a frequency analysis <br /> <br /> <br />to such an extent that any conclusion drawn from it would be so much on the <br /> <br />conservative side that it would be useless. To illustrate this the record <br /> <br /> <br />shows no storable water for the period 1953 through 1957 and nOlle for 1964 <br /> <br /> <br />and 1968. The frequencies belonging to the event that no water can be stored <br /> <br /> <br />under the 1975 priority would be in once every 4 years which is clearly in <br /> <br /> <br />conflict with 0 divertible amounts in 5 consecutive years. <br /> <br />To determine the severity of the 1950's drought period, the water-supply <br /> <br /> <br />index for the basin composed of runoff recorded on the South Platte and its <br /> <br /> <br />major tributaries was analyzed for a 46-year period. This analysis shows <br /> <br /> <br />that the low runoff recorded in the calendar year of 1954 has a return period <br /> <br /> <br />of 65 to 330 years. The 5-year dry cycle extending over 1953 through 1957 <br /> <br /> <br />has a return period between 100 and 500 years. This clearly indicates that <br /> <br /> <br />the analysis of the 1975 priority is limited in its results to the region of <br /> <br /> <br />the 50 percent probability range whereby 2200 acre-feet of storage may be <br /> <br /> <br />anticipated once in every 2 years from the Plum Creek watershed alone.' ,A <br /> <br /> <br />more significant result of the study, however, was the need that was pointed <br /> <br /> <br />out for the detailed analysis of the drought period experienced during the <br /> <br />1950's. <br /> <br />- 12 - <br /> <br />M. W. BITTINGER AND ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.