Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> ~ <br /> ) Cl <br /> C;, <br /> ) 1'.) <br /> , . .~ <br /> ) ..;:. <br /> ~ ,..., <br /> } <br /> ) <br /> I <br /> ) <br /> ~ <br /> .' <br /> ) <br /> ,"r <br /> ,) <br /> /) <br /> ~..' <br /> "\ <br /> > <br /> ) <br /> " <br /> .) <br /> ) <br /> '\ <br /> ....' <br /> ,.~. <br /> ) <br /> .} <br /> " <br /> "j <br /> , <br /> .:., <br /> ~ <br /> ,; <br />J <br /> ) <br />.' <br /> ]. <br />" , <br /> , <br /> ) <br />" j <br /> " <br /> <br />Plata, Los Pinos, Mancos. Navajo, and Piedra rivers and Mc Elmo Creek. Also included <br />were several smaller creeks or streams that are tributaries of the larger rivers, The <br />smaller streams that were sampled consisted of Cherry Creek, Long Hollow Creek, Rock <br />Creek, Stollsteimer Creek, and Navajo Wash (Figure 1). <br /> <br />METHODS <br /> <br />The data presented in this report are the result of two main sources of information. These <br />sources consist of: 1) a literature review of historical fish surveys and, 2) data collected <br />by Miller Ecological Consultants (MEC) as part of a native fish habitat study (Miller et <br />al. 1995). The literature review includes historical reports of fish surveys in the <br />previously mentioned tributaries of the San Juan River. All fish species reported within <br />the study area were assigned a species code (Table 2). <br /> <br />Tables are provided that summarize relative abundance of each species during each <br />decade by tributary, During each decade that a species was collected a letter <br />corresponding to the relative abundance was provided. The letter" A" indicates that the <br />species was numerically dominant or abundant in samples. The letter "c" indicates that <br />the species was common but not numerically dominant. The letter "R" indicates that the <br />species was rarely collected in that river during that decade. The letter "P" was used <br />when a species was reported in collections but numerical data were not provided. <br /> <br />Historical data and data collected by MEC are provided in Appendix A. All data was <br />organized by location and time period. Appendix A contains a table with fish capture <br />information, and a corresponding table that provides specific locations of sampling sites. <br />In some cases data was not available or provided for certain sampling events. In <br />instances where a precise date was not provided only the year was listed. When sampling <br />events occurred but no fish were collected, the words "no fish" were placed in the column <br />ofthe first fish species. Data that was considered questionable due to lack of information <br />(site location, date, etc.) or was reported by inexperienced personnel was not presented in <br />the results of this study. <br /> <br />Some ofthe larger tributaries below Navajo Reservoir have site locations that range over <br />considerable distances. In these instances there was a noticeable change in species <br />composition that probably resulted from change in elevation and gradient. These streams <br />were divided into reaches based on changes in general physical characteristics. The data <br />that is presented in Appendix A was sorted by reach and date. <br /> <br />Draft Final Tributary Report <br />Miller Ecological CODsultanlll, lnc. <br /> <br />January 31, 2000 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />; <br />