Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o <br />C) <br />i'~ <br />1". ., <br /> <br />C) <br />IV <br /> <br />No/emigonus cryso/eucas (golden shiner): The golden shiner was only encountered on <br />two occasions during the historical sampling of these San Juan River tributaries. Both <br />collections of this non-native species occurred in tributaries upstream of Navajo <br />reservoir, Three individuals were collected from the Navajo River during 1972, amI two <br />individuals were reported from the Los Pinos River during 1992, The golden shiner was <br />not encountered during the habitat use study, <br /> <br />Pimepha/es promelas (fathead minnow): Earliest reports of this non-native species in the <br />study area of the San Juan drainage came from the Animas River during 1954, By the <br />late] 970s this species had been reported from the Navajo River, and appeared to be well <br />established in the La Plata River, Mancos River, Navajo Wash and Mc Elmo Creek, By <br />1992 the fathead minnow had been reported from all major tributaries of the San Juan <br />River. After becoming established, the fathead minnow became a dominant fish species <br />in at many locations, Streams with large populations of fathead minnows include the La <br />Plata River, the lower Mancos River and Mc Elmo Creek. Due to the small adult size of <br />this species it is often overlooked by the sampling techniques used in large rivers. It is <br />likely that sizable populations of fathead minnows also exist in some systems that are <br />difficult to sample, Fathead minnows were represented in the MEC habitat use data by <br />adult and juvenile size classes. Representatives of both size classes were found <br />inhabiting all three major habitat types. Juveniles were found primarily in glide habitat, <br />while adult fathead minnows were collected mostly from pool habitat. <br /> <br />Caloslomus commersoni (white sucker): Historical fish sampling in the San Juan <br />drainage suggests that this non-native species has become established in several major <br />tributaries, The first report of this species in the study area came from the Animas River <br />during] 961. It was also reported with some frequency in early collections from <br />tributaries upstream of Navajo Reservoir. Olson (1962b) indicated that this species had <br />become established in the area now inundated by Navajo Reservoir, It is likely that the <br />white sucker had become established in certain areas upstream of Navajo Reservoir prior <br />to collections made during the early 1970s, The earliest reports of this species occurring <br />in the Florida River came from collections made during 1983. By the early] 990s <br />sampling efforts indicated that this species had become more common in the Florida <br />River than in the Animas River, Sampling efforts at other locations during the 1990s <br />indicated that the white sucker had become established (even dominant at some locations) <br />in tributaries upstream of Navajo reservoir, however this species had still not been <br />reported from most of the lower tributaries, As of] 998 the white sucker had not been <br />reported from the La Plata River, Mancos River or McElmo Creek. <br /> <br />(, <br /> <br />During the habitat use study the white sucker was represented in collections by all three <br />size classes, however most were juveniles, Only one individual in the "young ofthe <br />year" (YOY) size class was collected during this study, This fish was captured while <br />occupying riffle habitat, Juvenile white suckers were captured from each habitat type, <br />The data suggests that most juvenile white suckers reside in glide habitat, Adults were <br />found in glide habitat and pool habitat. No white sucker adults were encountered in riffle <br />habitat. <br /> <br />Draft Final Tributary Report <br />M iller Ecological ConsuUants, J nc. <br /> <br />January 31,2000 <br />Page 24 <br />