My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07808
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07808
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:28:59 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:37:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8144.400.10
Description
Great Plains Reservoirs - Reports - Feasibility Report
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
1/1/1989
Author
Univ of CO - CO Spri
Title
Great Plains Reservoirs Multiple Use Development Feasibility Engineering Hydrology & Operations
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />22SG <br /> <br />Seepage losses occur during transit of water through the <br />canals. The adjudicated canal loss rate is 25 percent for the <br />Fort Lyon Canal, 16 percent for the Kicking Bird Canal and 16 <br />percent for the Satanta Canal. There is uncertainty associated <br />with these seepage losses as their magnitude can vary over a <br />large range depending upon the amount of flow and duration of a <br />canal run. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Evaporation from the reservoir surface is another component of <br />the Great Plains water budget. Monthly average evaporation <br />rates were used for the subject study based on the U.S. Weather <br />Bureau data (Table 2-3). The total annual evaporation is <br />estimated to be 4.85 feet per year and average evaporation for <br />the Great Plains system for the period 1950-1979 was estimated <br />to be 12,800 AF/year with 8800 AF/year occurring from Queen <br />Reservoir and 4000 AF/year from Nee Sopah and Nee Noshe <br />Reservoirs (Zorich, 1986). <br /> <br />2.4 Region Water Quality <br /> <br />The lower Arkansas River valley is characterized as having <br />relatively poor water quality due to irrigation return flows <br />downstream and east of Pueblo. A substantial portion of water <br />applied for irrigation is lost to evaporation and plant <br />transpiration, thereby causing concentration of dissolved salts <br />in the remaining water which percolates to the groundwater <br />table and thence flows downgradient back to the river. <br /> <br />Water quality characteristics of the lower Arkansas River were <br />recently studied by the U.S Geological survey (Cain, 1987) <br />using specific conductance and dissolved chemical constituents <br />as the primary indicators. Specific conductance is a measure of <br />a water's ability to conduct an electric current and is a good <br />indicator of the total amount of dissolved solids in the water. <br /> <br />Specific conductance is shown to increase with distance <br />downstream along the Arkansas River (Figure 2-4). Of interest <br />to the subject study is the quality of Arkansas River water <br />when it is diverted at the Fort Lyon Canal headgate. As <br />indicated by the figures, the average specific conductance just <br />upstream of La Junta is approximately 1500 umhos but ranges up <br />to as much as 3000 umhos. These values correspond to total <br />dissolved solids concentrations of 1200 mg/l (milligrams per <br />liter) and 2600 mg/l respectively. <br /> <br />Water quality varies seasonally due to differences in the <br />proportion of river water originating as snowmelt runoff <br />(spring) and irrigation return flow (winter). Table 2-4 lists <br />the monthly specific conductance and total dissolved solids <br />used to define the diversion flow qualities obtained from the <br />Arkansas River at the Fort Lyon headgate. Results of sampling <br />confirm these data (Table 2-5). <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.