Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CHAPTER IV <br /> <br />PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND <br />QUANTIFICATION ACTIVITIES <br /> <br />o <br />l\J <br />.:::. <br />w <br /> <br />flow of the river immediately below the dome was approximately 582 cfs; <br />and the average TDS concentration was 334 mg/L, representing an annual <br />salt loading of 191,600 tons. The difference between the 191,600 tons <br />and the 118,900 tons--72,700 tons per year--represents the loading to <br />the river by all sources in the vicinity of the dome. An annual salt <br />loading of 51,300 tons annually was attributed to Coal and Curtis <br />Creeks, based on gaging stations and water quality samples at these two <br />sources. The remaining salt loading was assumed to be derived from the <br />dome itself. Based on an average water quality of 16,690 mg/L, the <br />discharge from the dome was estimated to be about 1.3 cfs. <br /> <br />'; <br /> <br />Hypotheses <br /> <br />Two basic hypotheses were studied which, it is believed, account <br />for saline water escaping from deep saline aquifers (the Entrada and the <br />Weber Formations) and flowing to the surface along the north side of the <br />White River. One concept was that deep exploratory wells provided the <br />corridors for saline water under pressure in deep aquifers to escape to <br />the surface formations (the Dakota and Morrison Formations) and to flow <br />by gravity to the river; this concept is referred to as the "well- <br />related" hypothesis. Opposite this was the hypothesis that the pressure <br />in the lower saline aquifers forced saline water to the surface along <br />natural fractures in the domal structure. This is referred to as the <br />"natural causes" hypothesis. To some degree, both mechanisms could <br />occur in combination. <br /> <br />Based on available data, the "well-related" hypothesis was theo- <br />rized to be responsible for the transmission of saline waters into the <br />White River. Although earlier investigations had centered on the Meeker <br />Well, the Marland Well was believed to actually be the main channel for <br />the saline water movement from the deeper aquifers. <br /> <br />According to this hypothesis, the insufficient plug and deteri- <br />orated casing in the Marland Well allowed saline water to move ver- <br />tically into near surface aquifer(s) in the Morrison Formation. The <br />saline water apparently moved laterally by gravity flow along the <br />Morrison and Dakota Formations and surfaced in springs and seeps where <br />the Dakota is exposed by the river. <br /> <br />The sequence of events that are believed to have resulted in saline <br />water flowing from the Morrison Formation into the river are described <br />below and depicted in Figure 2. <br /> <br />1. The Meeker Well, drilled in the early 1900' s into the <br />upper Entrada, developed a surface flow of saline water <br />of about 3 cfs. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />The Ma rland <br />about 1925. <br />the Entrada <br /> <br />Well was drilled into the Weber Formation <br />Water moved up the bore from the Weber into <br />Formation, increasing salinity and pressure <br /> <br />12 <br />