My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07805
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07805
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:28:58 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:37:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8270.100
Description
Colorado River Basin Water Quality/Salinity -- Misc Water Quality
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
2/1/1984
Title
Colorado River Water Quality Improvement Program - Meeker Dome Unit Colorado - Preliminary Findings Report - Feb 1984
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />o <br />i\J <br />A <br />~ <br /> <br />CHAPTER IV <br /> <br />PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND <br />QUANTIFICATION ACTIVITIES <br /> <br /><. <br /> <br />apparently have had little effect on the upper Morrison aquifer, since <br />hydraulic continuity had not been disrupted. Faults and/or closely <br />spaced joints created localized zones that were more transmissive than <br />others but, overall, the upper Morrison produced up to 100 gallons per <br />minute (gpm) of saline water from the same geologic and stratigraphic <br />position over most of the dome. <br /> <br />On either flank of the dome, increased gradients and less over- <br />burden allowed upper Morrison water to recharge the lower part of the <br />Dakota Sandstone where saline water under pressure is found. The Dakota <br />Sandstone contained water with quality nearly identical to that in the <br />upper Morrison. Elsewhere on the dome, the Dakota was not saturated and <br />therefore was not considered an aquifer. A largely unconfined alluvial <br />aquifer on the eastern edge of the dome had been intruded by saltwater <br />flowing from the Dakota Sandstone. <br /> <br />No usable ground water resources existed in the dome area because <br />saline water had penetrated all permeable zones within the upper 2,100 <br />feet of sediments. <br /> <br />Surface water quality <br /> <br />The dissolved solids in the White River above Coal Creek were pre- <br />dominantly calcium bicarbonate and calcium sulfate. Coal Creek water <br />had a calcium, magnesium, sulfate, bicarbonate composition with over <br />three times the total dissolved solids (TDS) concentration of the river. <br />Curtis Creek was much more saline, but ita magnesium sulfate/sodium <br />sulfate character indicated a different source of salt content--Mancos <br />Shale which occurs throughout the watershed. The salinity of the river <br />at Meeker was higher than at Coal Creek, and there were significantly <br />higher sodium, chloride, and sulfate concentrations. These three con- <br />stituents accounted for approximately 75 percent of the increase in <br />TDS in the surface water. <br /> <br />Ground watet quality <br /> <br />When first penetrated by the Meeker and Marland Wells, the bedrock <br />aquifers beneath Meeker Dome apparently contained water of different <br />quality. Observations made at the drilling were largely based on easily <br />perceived differences such as temperature and odor. Discharge from the <br />Meeker Well was noted to have become more mineralized when the Marland <br />Well was drilled. <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />All bedrock aquifers contained saline water with very similar chem- <br />ical makeup. The saline water in these aquifers contained an average of <br />17,520 mg/L TDS with the following ions present: chloride, 44 percent; <br />sodium, 32 percent; and sulfate, 18 percent.l/ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />There were temperature differences among the waters in the various <br />bedrock units. Temperatures in the deep bedrock units encountered at <br /> <br />l/ Percentages were based on weight (mg/L). <br /> <br />10. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.