My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP07784
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
7001-8000
>
WSP07784
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:28:55 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:36:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8221.112.I
Description
Central Arizona Project
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
4/29/1983
Title
Draft Environmental Impact Statement: Regulatory Storage Division - Central Arizona Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />m <br />:-'"l <br />ex) <br />C\J <br /> <br />workshops, speakers at three public meetings held in September <br />comments received from response forms in a CAWCS publ ication, the <br />Governor's Advisory Committee, and the Central Arizona <br />Conservation District. <br /> <br />1981, <br />CAWCS <br />~Jater <br /> <br />I (;ct?:\ <br /><:,:,j <br />I '.<,r-- <br /> <br />In October 1981, the CAWCS planning team participoted in a <br />"tradeoff" meeting to review all available information on the <br />alternatives and to formulate recommendations. Alternatives were <br />eva 1 uated based on performance, cost, economi c benefits, pub 1 i c <br />acceptebility, engineering feasibility, environmental impacts, social <br />impacts and implementability. As a result of these analyses, the <br />Arizona Projects Office of the Bureau of Reclamation recommended that <br />Plans 1, 3, and 6 were appropriate for consideration as the proposed <br />action. After reviewing the three recommended plans, the Secretary of <br />the Interior selected Plan 6 as the agency proposed action in November <br />1981, citing the plan's high performance, public support, and avoidance <br />of impacts to the Fort McDowell Tndian Community. <br /> <br />III. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT <br /> <br />A. General Description of CAWCS Area Significant Resources <br /> <br />1. ~iological Resources <br /> <br />Six resource factors within the CAWCS area have been <br />identified as having importance with respect to action-related impacts: <br /> <br />1. Riparian/Wetland Biotic Communities <br />2. Other Terrestrial Biotic Communities <br />3. Perennial Stream/Riverine Aquatic Communities <br />4. Reservoir Aquatic Communities (Lakes and <br />Lacustrine Communities) <br />5. Threatened and Endangered Plants and Wildlife <br />6. f1anagement anc! Special Use Areas <br /> <br />Acreage and percent ranges of the major biotic <br />communities occurring in the CAWCS study area are shown in Table 3. <br /> <br />2. Water Quality <br /> <br />The water qual ity of local surface water sources in the <br />CAWCS area is measured by concentrations for 45 constituents includinq a <br />number of elements and compounds, fecal coliforms, dissolved solids, and <br />phenolics, as well as by measures of alkalinity, hardness, specific <br />conductance, and sodium absorption ratio. Safe levels of some <br />constituents are prescribed by law for various water uses; the levels of <br />water qual ity constituents in surface water sources in the CA~JCS area <br />vary considerably from season to season and from one source to another. <br />These local sources could be either improved or degraded by regulatory <br />storage mixing. <br /> <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.