WSP07784 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~ C":. QO e-: (,: t;._ ;1(' ~:: :;'-:. Plan 8 (No CAWCS action) Plan 1 Plan 2 Plan 3 plan 6 (Agency proposed action) Plan 7 TABLE 2 COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES ADVANTAGES No project-related cost No project-related impacts to Fort McDowell lndian Community No project-related impacts to endangered species. riparian habitat, or cultural resources Moderate public support Relatively low cost No impacts to Fort McDowell Indian Community High level of flood protection Moderate increase in CAP yield SoLves dam safety problems Moderate public support Lowest cost of all action pLans SOLves dam safety probLems NO impacts to Fort,McDowell Indian Community Insignificant impacts to endangered species Provides moderate increase in flood protection Highest increase in CAP yield High level of flood protection Significant increase in power revenues and other economic benefits Provides flexible CAP operations Provides reliable water supply Significant increase in lake recreation Significant increase in CAP yield High level of flood protection Highest increase in power revenues and other economic benefits Provides reliable water suppLy Provides flexible CAP operations Significant increase in lake recreation No impacts to Fort McDowell Indian Collllllunity Insignificant impacts to endangered species Strong broad-based public support Moderate increase in CAP yield High level of flood protection Significant increase in power revenues and other economic benefits Provides flexible CAP operations Provides reliable water suppLy Significant increase in lake recreation Provides opportunities for fish and wildlife enhancement Provides opportunities for deveLopment of Sal t River rec rea t ion through Phoenix No impacts to Fort- HcDowell Indian Community Moderate public support 7 DISADV ANT AGES No increased flood protection No additional water suppLy beyond CAP baseline Significantly less power revenues than regulatory storage plans No flexibility in CAP operations Dam safety studies continue Less reliable water supply than regulatory storage plans Significantly less power revenues and other economic benefits than regulatory storage plans No flexibility in CAP operation Adverse impacts to endangered species, riparian habitat, and cultural resources Insignificant increase in CAP yield Less reliable water supply than regulatory storage plans Hinimal power revenues and other economic benefits No flexibility in CAP operations Adverse impacts to riparian habitat and cultural resources Hinimum public support Highest cost of all. action plans Severe impacts to Fort HcDowe11 Indian Community Severe impacts to endangered species. riparian habitat, and cultural resources Severe impacts to stream recreation POtential for reservoir eutrophication and degradation of water quality Highly controversial - divided public support High cos t Adverse impacts to riparian habitat and cultural resources High cost Adverse impacts to endangered species, riparian habitat, and cultural resources