Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ECONOMIC INDICATORS OF WATER DELIVERIES <br />IIOO '" <br />105 ~ <br />1000 <br />950 <br />900 <br />850 <br />800 Construction Costs <br />75 <br />700 <br />650 <br />600 ~ <br />550 ::l <br /> ;:: <br /> ~ <br />500 <br />45 N <br /> ~ <br /> ~ <br />40 ~ <br /> ;! <br />350 <br />300 OJ <br /> ...J s: !:: <br />250 '" M <br /> <I: N <br />200 U ;;; ;;; <br />:l N N <br /> Cl. <br />150 Cl. <br /><I: <br />100 ,.. ~ ~ ~ <br /> 0 1; ~ :l :l <br />50 Z <br />.. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8. 8b 10 11 12 13. I3b <br />. 9 <br />~ <br />'. <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />Economic Indicators of Water Deliveries <br /> <br />Two economic criteria which indicate <br />the associated costs and benefits of <br />water supply alternatives are the net <br />annual economic benefits generated <br />per acre. foot of water delivered, and <br />project construction costs per acre. <br />foot of water delivered, A third mane. <br />tary criterion, internal rate of return, is <br />obtained by dividing the net annual <br />economic benefits hy construction <br />costs. Greater net annual economic <br />benefits per acre.foot are associated <br />with municipal and industrial water <br />use and hydroelectric power, Alterna. <br />tives 2, 3, 10 and 11. <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br />Net annual economic benefits per <br />acre.foot of water delivered are smal. <br />lest for those alternatives associated <br />primarily with agriculture. Alterna. <br />tives 7, 8, 12 and 13, Net annual eco. <br />nomic benefits range from -$4,7 <br />million. Alternative 13a, to $38,3 mil. <br />lion. Alternative 10. Net annual eco. <br />nomic benefits are relatively small for <br />Alternative 7 and 8a, because Alterna' <br />tive 7 develops very little water and <br />Alternative 8a requires construction <br />and operation of new water convey- <br />ance facilities, Because there are no <br />construction costs for Alternative L <br />the internal rate of return cannot be <br />calculated for this alternative, The <br />greatest internal rate of return would <br />be for Alternative 3 and Alternative 10, <br />both of which include a hydroelectric <br />power component. <br />