Laserfiche WebLink
<br />172l <br /> <br />FRYING PAN-ARKANSAS PROJECT, COLORADO <br /> <br />a L5-mUe supply eannl would be neccssnry. Through a series of ex- <br />changes a.nd eoordinuted opeTal,ion of the Mount. Pisgnh Reservoir <br />on Oil Creek and the Sknguay Resp.rvoir, snt.is(netory replacement <br />of irrigat.ion wilter in tbe Arkansas Vallev couln be achieved. <br />53, -Four thouSllnd acrc-fcet of project water annually have been <br />allot,ted to Colorado Springs for its immediate re~uirements. Of this <br />4,000 acre-fcet, 2,700 acre-feet could be pumped into the city's <br />system from Beaver Creek. Replacement of this 2,700 acre-feet for <br />irrigation would require 3,200 acre-feet, of project water due to <br />transit and other losses. The remaining 800 acre-feet of project <br />water represents reserve for replacement of possible diversions to the <br />citv from other tributaries of the Arkansas River. <br />54. Pueblo re~uireg 3,000 acre-feet of ,Jroject water annually. <br />Project facilities would also enable the conservation of 2,000 acre-feet <br />of 'Vurtrz ditch transmountoin water for municipal use and treatment <br />of Pueblo's present supply of 21,000 Rcre-feet. Delivery of water to <br />Pueblo would be accomplished from the Pueblo Reservoir through a <br />central svstem for all mllov towns. <br />55. TI;e vRlley towns require 8,000 ncre-feet of project water <br />nllllilfl.lly, of which 460 acre-feet represents a reserve for t,hose com- <br />munities and otbers. The water would entirely replace existing <br />ul1sati.;;fuctory supplies. <br />50. Specific facilities for supplying Pueblo and the valley towns <br />with municipal water include a pumping plant at the Pueblo Reservoir, <br />a witter treatment plant, a dnal pipeliue to Pueblo and a small regulat- <br />ing rcse,rvoir, a. trunk pipeline about 130 miles in length to Lamar. <br />and about 36 miles of brnnch pipelines to Crowley, Wiley, and Eads. <br />57. The municipal wat.er supply system would involve 110 unusual <br />construction problems or difficulties in securing rights-<Jf-way. <br />,58. Construction schedule.-About 10 years would be required to <br />construct the initial development. Early concurrent construction <br />of the Aspen, Twin Lakes; and Pueblo Reservoirs, the Fryingpan- <br />Arknnsll,s tunnel, and sc\-eral eastern slope cann.Is is planned to facili- <br />tate filling the reservoirs. The western slope collection system would <br />be cxpanded gmdually from the transmountain tunnel. All hydro- <br />phmts except Pueblo have been scheduled for simultaneous comple- <br />tion so t.heir operation can be integrnted as R unit. <br />59. Water Bupp/y.-The first phltse of the Gunnison-Arkansas <br />project (Roaring Fork diversiou) contemplates the a\'erage annual <br />consumptive use of water from the Colorado Ri\.er Basin as follows <br />(measured at points of diversion): <br />Explanation: Acre-fut' <br />Diversion from project collection !l.\'stem oC project water u.. .. __.. _ _ _ 69, 200 <br />Diversion for fish presen'ation purposes_ _.. _ __ _ _.. _ __ __ ____ _ _"_"_ ___ 3.000 <br />T,osses from Aspen Reservoir a.nd consumpth:e losses in collection <br />~onduit__._________ __. __ __ _ _ _ ____ ____.. ~ ~ ___ _ ___ __ _ _ _. _____ 3, QOO <br /> <br />TotaL __ _ __ __ _ _ ______ _ __ _ _ _ ___________ _________ _ _ __ _ ---- 75,200 <br />60. The water to be impo'rtod from the Colorado River watershed <br />isla come out of Colorado's apportionment under the upper Colorad() <br />RIver Basin compact of October 11, 1948. Under t,hat compact, t,h~ <br />State of Colorado is npportioned the consump,tivc use of 51.75 l'er. <br />cent of the water nvaUable for use m the upper Colorado R,vet <br />Basin, after deducting a use of not to exceed 50,000 acre-feet annually <br />